History - Fiction or Science/Russian roots of the "ancient" latin/Foreword

From Alternative Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

It turns out that 3,500 basic Slavic words gave rise to at least 20,300 "foreign".


THE METHOD OF SEARCHING FOR CONFORMITY BETWEEN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES: WE FIND WORDS, CLOSE BY SOUND AND, SIMULTANEOUSLY, CLOSE BY MEANING.

This edition comes out in a new edition, made by A.T. Fomenko. It differs markedly from the previous ones. In particular, color drawings reproduced as color (in contrast to previous editions, where they were reproduced as black and white). Before you is the second book of the 7th volume of the seven volume book "Chronology" (the seven volume book is divided into 14 books). She completes the seven-volume book.

  • Volume 1. NUMBERS AGAINST LIES. - A.T. Fomenko.
  • Volume 2. Book 1: ANTIQUITY IS THE MIDDLE AGES. - A.T. Fomenko. Book 2: CHANGE DATES - EVERYTHING CHANGES. - A.T. Fomenko.
  • Volume 3. Book 1: STARS ARE WITNESS. - V.V. Kalashnikov, G.V.Nosovsky, A.T. Fomenko. Book 2: THE HEAVENLY CALENDAR OF ANCIENTS - GVNosovsky, ATFomenko, T.N.Fomenko.
  • Volume 4. Book 1: NEW RUSSIAN CHRONOLOGY. - G.V.Nosovsky, A.T. Fomenko. Book 2: THE SECRET OF RUSSIAN HISTORY. - G.V.Nosovsky, A.T. Fomenko.
  • Volume 5. Book 1: EMPIRE. - G.V.Nosovsky, A.T. Fomenko. Book 2: COLOR THE KINGDOM. - G.V.Nosovsky, A.T. Fomenko.
  • Volume 6. Book 1: BIBLICAL RUSSIA. - G.V.Nosovsky, A.T. Fomenko. Book 2: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICA RUSSIA-HORD. - G.V.Nosovsky, A.T. Fomenko. Book 3: THE SEVEN WONDERS OF THE LIGHT. - G.V.Nosovsky, A.T. Fomenko.
  • Volume 7. Book 1: THE WESTERN MYTH. - G.V.Nosovsky, A.T. Fomenko. Book 2: RUSSIAN ROOTS "ANCIENT" LATYN. - G.V.Nosovsky, A.T. Fomenko, T.N. Fomenko.

This book occupies a very special place in our chronological studies. It cannot be considered as independent evidence of the New Chronology. On the other hand, after using mathematical and astronomical methods we have restored the backbone of the correct chronology, it is very interesting to look at the evolution of languages ​​and writing from a new point of view. According to our results, in the Great = "Mongol" Empire of the XIII-XVI centuries (that is, for several centuries), the main languages ​​were Slavic and Turkic. The state language of the Empire was probably Slavic. Only in the rebellious era of the Reformation of the end of the XVI - XVII centuries, after the split of the Empire, in its separated fragments, reformers who usurped power began to actively create new languages, in order to separate from the metropolis of the Empire (Russia-Horde) not only politically, but also in language, culturally.

It was for this purpose in the XVI-XVII centuries that new rulers called for special people who were instructed to "invent new languages." As a result, they created a science called "linguistics". She came up with a completely practical (and important for the rebel reformers) goal. Namely, to develop new languages ​​in new, just separated from the metropolitan states. However, the basis of the hastily created languages ​​("ancient" -Latin, "ancient" -Greek, French, English, German, Spanish, Italian, etc.) inevitably lay the state Slavic language in its broadest sense. After all, the reformers simply did not have any other material. Consequently, besides their will, all the new languages ​​and adverbs invented by them had to bear a deep "Slavic imprint". And in our book we have collected numerous testimonies of this. It is remarkable that they survived until now. Previously, these “Slavic footprints” were either not paid attention or were hushed up, since people of the 17th – 20th centuries were accustomed to using erroneous Scaligerian chronology. In which the very idea of ​​the origin, for example, of the "most ancient" Latin from the Slavic language was inadmissible. New chronology removes this unofficial ban.

Recall an important circumstance. As already mentioned in detail in the book Numbers Against Lies, most of the ancient texts were written by some consonants alone. For example, as regards the Bible, the following is known: "The Hebrew written language initially did not have any vowels or signs replacing them ... The books of the Old Testament were written only by consonants" [765], p.155.

This situation is typical. For example, the Old Slavonic text is also a chain of consonants, sometimes even without "vocal signs" and division into words. That is, a continuous stream of consonant letters.

Probably the rarity and high cost of writing materials in ancient times forced the scribes to save material by discarding vowels when writing. "True, if we now take the Hebrew Bible or a manuscript, we will find in them a skeleton of consonants filled with dots and other signs ... denoting missing vowels. These signs did not constitute the Hebrew Bible ... Books were read according to one consonant, filling them vowels ... as far as their skills and in accordance with the seeming requirements of meaning and oral traditions "[765], p.155.

For example, a combination of KRV can mean: blood, crooked, shelter, cow, gnarled, smoke, loaf, etc .; RK combination - river, hand, rock, etc. The arbitrariness of the proclamation in ancient languages ​​is extremely great. Many consonant combinations can be announced in dozens of different ways [765]. Gozenius wrote: "It is easy to understand how imperfect and unclear this way of writing." Quoted according to [765].

In our study, we are focusing precisely on the backbone of consonants, since the vocal words adopted today (the “coloring” of the backbone) took shape not so long ago. Reading our Dictionary, pay attention primarily to the backbone = the skeleton of the consonants in the word. Our Dictionary clearly shows that the various voices ("colors") of the same skeleton of the consonants were typical of the transition from language to language. Here, for example, the Russian word TO SUBJECT, I PUSH (I translate, I explain). For example, it gave rise to the following "foreign" words: TALK (speak English), TALA (speak Swedish), TOLK (interpreter, Swedish), TULKKI (translator, in Finnish). The “backbone” of the TLC remained, in general, the same, but the vowels “float”, and sometimes significantly.

What methods were used by reformers, "linguists" XVI-XVII centuries? Based on the results of the New Chronology, we found several such techniques. They were quite simple. We list some. For specific examples of the distortions of Slavic words, see further in our Dictionary.

  • In ancient times, the writing of some Slavic letters has not yet been settled, and even their position on the line has not yet been fixed. For example, one and the same letter (for example, Ш) could have been written in different ways: laying on its side (it turned out E or E), turning it upside down (it turned out something like M = m or "te" handwritten). Etc. In different geographical regions of the Empire, there were slightly different methods of writing the same Slavic letters. But at that distant time, the difficulties of reading, most likely, did not arise, since the population of the Empire owned (to one degree or another) Slavic language, and therefore different orientations of the same letter did not prevent people from understanding each other and the written texts. For example, khan decrees and government regulations. Reformers "linguists" recorded many of these various methods of writing letters, after which they craftily declared them to be "very ancient", stable, and supposedly not having any relation to the Slavic styles. It was "ordered" to forget about the original Slavic fundamental principle forever. The tradition of reading ancient texts in Slavonic was greatly violated. The next generation of young people who began to be taught in reform schools in a new way, naturally, knew nothing about the previous rules of reading. Their parents passed away, and the bearers of the old linguistic tradition gradually disappeared. Thus, young people quickly retrained. And their children grew all the more in the atmosphere of new rules of reading. Many old texts have become incomprehensible and forgotten. for example, the famous et-Russian inscriptions. A lot of time for such a "progressive reform" is not needed. Only - one or two generations.
  • Another "reformist device" is clearly seen in the example of French. They forced the population not to voice (that is, not to read out loud) some letters or their combinations. A modern example: instead of a Peugeot, it should now read Peugeot. As a result, the voiced text was very different from the old original. By the way, during a trip to France, A.T. Fomenko and T.N.Fomenko reported to us that in some villages (for example, on the border with Spain) people used to read all the written letters out loud in the old fashioned way (mostly in everyday life). But when they come to state institutions or fill in official papers, they say "as it should be today," that is, skipping and distorting the sound of some letters. Such a "progressive reception" of the XVI-XVII centuries was, of course, effective, since it plunged into oblivion the old Slavic sound of many ancient words.
  • Previously, there were two ways to read the words: from left to right (like modern Europeans) and from right to left (like Arabs and Jews, for example). Reformers actively took advantage of this. In many cases, they changed the way they read words. As a result, ancient Slavic words became almost unrecognizable. That was what the "creators of new languages" wanted.
  • In the Russian tradition, an affirmative nod of the head meant (and means today) agreement, and a swaying of the head left-right means denial. In the era of the Reformation on the territory of Bulgaria, these gestures were reversed, and now here they nod their heads in denial and sway from left to right in agreement.
  • This book can be called the "Concise Dictionary of Parallelisms". It was created for a long time, several years. Compared with the previous editions of our Dictionary, the current version, which arose as a result of a lot of work in 2001-2011, has been significantly expanded and reached a new level. First of all, due to the new and very numerous parallelisms of the SLAVIC LANGUAGE WITH THE LATIN AND GREEK. Now in our Dictionary about 3520 Russian words. The book is organized as follows. The FIRST and its main part, containing about 3030 Russian words, consists of correspondences, which, in our opinion, are quite reliable. SECOND, the smaller part of the Dictionary, consists of 490 words, correspondences with which seem to us less reliable. However, we also included them in the Dictionary, as material for further research.

At the same time, it was found that at least 3,500 “semantic bushes” of Latin words, about 2,750 bushes of English words, about 1,120 bushes of German words and about 1,050 bushes of Greek words occurred from 3,520 Russian words. Let us emphasize that we have indicated here the number of bushes, and each of them contains, generally speaking, many separate words. We paid the main attention, of course, to the Latin language, which is today considered the foundation of many Western European languages. In total, our Dictionary contains about 20,300 words that are considered foreign today (Latin, English, etc.). That is, from 3520 Slavic words in the Middle Ages about 20300 "foreign" words occurred in total. Consequently, on average, from each Slavic word- "parent" arose, as we see, approximately in SIX of "foreign" words- "children" (20300: 3520 = 5.77). I must say that 3520 words were in our Dictionary for November 2011. However, the dictionary is constantly and quickly replenished. So today it already has significantly more words.

We emphasize that the three and a half thousand basic Slavic words found in our Dictionary were, apparently, quite enough for meaningful communication of people in the Middle Ages. It was the foundation of communication. Basically, Slavic. In this case, we must assume, we found far from all correspondences.

  • The principle of comparison, proposed by us as the basis of the Dictionary of Parallelisms, is quite simple, although it seems to be new. We were looking for words, CLOSE BY MEANING AND CLOSE ON SOUND, THERE ARE CLOSE "STRONGS OF AGREEMENT". Conventionally, we called it the "method of semantic equations." Refine our thought.

First: moving consistently, for example, in the Russian-Latin dictionary [666: 1], we searched for Slavic words and MEANS THE SAME, that is, HAVING THE SAME MEANING, Latin words usually indicated in the dictionary as translations of the corresponding Russian word. In other words, the "relevant" Slavic and Latin words should be APPROXIMATELY MEANING IN MEANING, that is, MEAN ONE AND THE SAME, and also, should SEE LIKE SOUND (have close bones of consonants). Then, in a similar way, we also processed the Latin-Russian dictionary [237]. That is, moving step by step according to the Latin words, we analyzed their Russian translations, looking for correspondences - that is, NEED OF MEANING AND SIMULTANEOUSLY VOICE SHOWER.

Secondly: having found the MEAN SINGLE ONE AND SAME, and ALSO CLARIFYING SOUNDING words-synonyms (Russian and Latin, as well as Latin and Russian), we carefully compared their spelling, that is, the letters used, their graphics and the sounds transmitted by them. As a result, those linguistic transitions that once turned Slavic words into Latin ones came to light. At the same time, it became clear what exactly sounds went into which, which letters "turned over", which "mirrored", etc. As a result, we often managed to reconstruct the transformations of Slavic words into Latin ones.

In other words, “equating two words, meaning Russian and corresponding (Latin in meaning, meaning) Latin, we get, as it were, a semantic equation, from which it becomes clear which transitions of sounds and letters occurred in the past . The method of semantic equations proposed by us may be useful in further analyzing the origin of many modern languages ​​from the Slavic fundamental principle in the era of the XIV-XVI centuries.

  • Some parallels linguists have noticed before, but to evaluate them and do in full the work, like ours, they were hampered by the erroneous Scaligerian chronology, which in fact imposed a ban on the very principle of such a comparison.

Some interesting parallels have been reported to us by the readers of our books and members of our website chronologia.org. We express deep gratitude to them all.

  • We make an important remark. The individual correspondences we give may seem unexpected at first glance. However, most often they turn out to be particular cases of some common, “mass” parallelism, which manifests itself in a whole group of words that are close in meaning. Therefore, we recommend reading our Dictionary slowly, assessing not individual examples taken out of context, but the whole group of close words, the whole "semantic shrub".

We paid the main attention to the Slavic-Latin parleleles. After all, it is well known that LATIN ROOTS ARE IN MANY EUROPEAN LANGUAGES. THEREFORE, ESTABLISHING THE ORIGIN OF THE "CLASSICAL LATYNI" FROM SLAVIC HIGH-SPEEDS, WE ARE MOST AUTOMATICALLY PRESENTING THE SLAVIAN ROOTS AND IN MANY OTHER WESTERN-EUROPEAN ROOT AND ITS ISS I Aa Ae Ae Ae Aant Ae Aant Ae Aant Ace Aid Of Awets Awets Achors Achors Achors Achors, Aroma Aid, Aromatika, Aromatika, Aromatika, And Aromatika Wydroma

Readers will benefit from an electronic version of our dictionary, since it facilitates the search for foreign words. The fact is that we have ordered our Dictionary of the Russian alphabet, but it is often useful to quickly find a foreign word. Here automatic search on the computer is very convenient. You can use the electronic version of the preliminary version of this Dictionary, posted on our website chronologia.org. This first version of the Dictionary was included in our book "Reconstruction", published in Moscow by RIMIS in 2005, as an Appendix, written by A.T. Fomenko, G.V.Nosovsky, T.N. Fomenko. The text of this book is fully posted on the specified site.

The concept of "semantic bushes" introduced by us turned out to be very useful. Many parallels become much clearer and more visible when you can compare "close words" from several languages.

As it turned out, many Russian words considered today borrowed from the "ancient" Latin, the "ancient" Greek and other foreign languages, in fact, have a root Slavic origin. But then forgotten. The reader will learn about all this from our Dictionary. We will now list examples. Many of them are unexpected.

However, in order not to overwhelm the Preface, we will not immediately indicate their Slavic "parents". When you read our book, you will find all these words "immersed" in their extensive "semantic" bushes "and see for yourself their Slavic origin. For a quick search of the listed words, it is convenient to use the electronic version of our Dictionary. We repeat that its preliminary version is on the site chronologia.org - in the Annex to the book "Reconstruction".

It must be said that in many of the cases listed below, the Slavic origin of “foreign” words is by no means obvious. It became clear only after we managed to put together the large bushes of “foreign” words, arising from their Slavic “parents”. The ancient Slavic word, going over to Western languages, changed slightly, and then "returned" to Russia as a supposedly borrowed foreign one. The distortions that have arisen along this path (there and back) make it difficult to immediately recognize the Slavic original. But when the “path of the word” is nevertheless restored, the picture immediately becomes clear. That is why it is necessary to study the entire "semantic bush" in which a particular word is "immersed".

On the other hand, some of the below "foreign" words are today perceived as originally Russian. We are used to them. However, if you turn to explanatory dictionaries, you will be surprised to see that linguists often (and persistently) derive their origin, for example, from the "most ancient" Latin or from Greek. As we now understand, in many cases they are mistaken because they rely on the incorrect Scaligerian chronology.

So, let us give, for example, the following well-known, supposedly "foreign", words in Russian:

A) abort, abstrakcija, avantjura, avtor, agressija, administrator, Adriaticheskij, akademija, akvarium, akkumulirovat', akrobat, akt, akter, aktivnyj, akustika, akcija (kak dejstvie), alebastr, alibi, alkogol', al'timetr, ambrozija (pishha bogov), amin', amplua (naprimer, aktera), ampula, amputacija, amunicija, analiz (v raznyh smyslah), analogija, anemija, annulirovat', aperitiv, aplodismenty, apostol, appetit, approksimacija, aprobacija, argument, argumentacija, arifmetika, arka, Arktika, arkticheskij, armija, arsenal, arterija, artikuljacija, artillerija, artist, arheologija, arhi- (kak pristavka vo mnogih slovah), arhiv, aspirin, assimilicija, assistent, astenichnyj (chelovek), astma, astrologija, astronomija, asfal't, ataka, atlet, atletika, atmosfera, audiencija, aura.

B) baza, bazis, bal, balet, ballon, bant, baptizm, baptist, barbekju, barometr, bar'er, Biblija, biblioteka, bint, blondin(ka), botanika, bronza, brjuki, burlesk.

V) vakansija, vakuum, val's, vektor, ventiljator, villa, vojazh.

G) garazh, garderob, garmonija, garmonichnyj, gvardija, genealogija, genitalii, geometrija, gidrodinamika, gimnastika, giperbola (sil'noe preuvelichenie), gipnoz, giroskop, globus, godograf, gorizont, gospital', gradus, graf, grafik, grafika, grafolog, gripp, gumanizm, gumanitarnyj.

D) dajdzhest, dantist, degustacija, delegat, delegacija, delikates, delikatnost', demiurg, demokratija, demon, deportacija, deputat, deputacija, destruktivnyj, diagnoz, diagramma, dialekt, dialektika, dialog, diametr, dieta, diktant, diktator, dikcija, dinamo, dinamika, diplomat, diplomatija, direktor, diskretnyj, diskussija, dispozicija, disput, dissertacija, dissident, dissipacija, distancija, dispersija, disciplina, doktor (uchenaja stepen'), drama.

Zh) zhele, zhjuri.

Z) zal, zdanie, zodchij.

I) identichnyj, ideologija, ikona, ikonografija, illjuzija, illjustracija, imperator, imperija, impotencija, improvizacija, indeks (ukazatel' v knige), individuum, individual'nyj, indul'gencija, industrija, inkvizicija, inkrustacija, inkubator, inspekcija, inspektor, instancija, institut, instrukcija, instrument, insul't, intellekt, intellektual, intelligent, interval, interpretacija, introdukcija, incest, incident, intensivnyj, ippodrom, ironija, irrigacija, istorija, iteracija.

K) kal'kuljator, kandidat, kardiologija, kapital'nyj, kareta, karcer, kasta, kastracija, kataklizm, katalog, katapul'ta, katastrofa, katenoid (matem.), katet (matem.), kinetika, kinematika, Kir (car'), klaviatura, klavishi, klepsidra, kleptomanija (strast' k vorovstvu), klinika, klipsy, koalicija, kollazh, kollaps, kollega, kollegija, kollektiv, kollekcija, kollizija, kollokvium, kolonija, kolonist, koma, komedija, komik, komicheskij, kommutirovat', kommutativnyj, komplekt, kompozitor, konversija, konvul'sija, konsilium, konspiracija, konstanta, konstruirovat', konstrukcija, konsul, konsul'tacija, konstitucija, kontinuum (matem.), kontrakt, kontribucija, kontuzija, kooperacija, korrektor, korrekcija, korrupcija, kosmetika, kosmos, koncepcija, kon'jak, kredit, kreon, kriminal, kriptografija, kristall, kritika, krokodil, kul'minacija, kul't, kul'tura, Kupidon, kursirovat', kursor.

L) lampa, lampada, laringolog (vrach), legal'nyj, legitimnyj, leksika, leksikon, lektor, lekcija, lider, lingvistika, litera, literatura, literator, licenzija, logarifm, logika, ljuks, ljustra.

M) maksimum, manipulirovat', manipuljator, manija, masturbacija, matematika, medik, megapolis, medicina, memuary, menstruacija, meridian, metafora, metropolija, mikrob, mikroskop, mikstura, militarizm, milicija, mimika, minimum, ministr, ministerstvo, minuta, mirazh, moduljacija, monolog, monstr, monument, moratorij, morfologija, municipal'nyj, muskuly, mushket, mushketer.

N) navigacija, natura, natural'nyj, nacional'nost', nacija, nekroz, nerv, nigilizm, nimb, nol'.

O) obligacija, observatorija, obstrukcija, okuljar, okulist (vrach), okkul'tizm, okkul'tnyj, okkupacija, operacija, oppozicija, optika, orakul, orator, oratorija, orbita, orgija, orden (kak nagrada i kak rycarskij sojuz), ordinarnyj, ordinarec, original, ornament, ornitolog, ortodoks, ortodoksal'nyj, orfografija, oftal'molog.

P) pakt, parad, parazit, parashjut, pari', paroksizm, parfjumerija, passivnyj, passionarnost', pasport, pasha, patriot, pauza, pacifist, pajacy, pedagog, pediatr, penal'ti (naprimer, v futbole), period, peripetii, perlamutr, perljustracija (pisem), persona, personazh, personal'nyj, perspektiva, perforacija, peticija, ping-pong, plantacija, plastik, plastika, plastichnyj, plebej, plutokratija, pozicija, politika, policija, ponton, populjarnost', postskriptum, potencija, pojema, pojet, pragmatizm, prezentacija, prezident, prezidium, premija, prem'er, preparirovat', presviter, privatizacija, privatnyj, prima, princip, principial'nyj, provincija, provokator, provokacija, prognoz, prolog, propaganda, prospekt, prostitucija, protezhe, protektor, protekcija, protest, prototip, process, processija, publika, publichnost', pudra, pul'verizator, purpur, p'edestal.

R) ratifikacija (dogovora), ratusha, racion, racional'nyj, revoljucija, redis(ka), rezekcija (hirurg.), rezjume, rekvizicija, rekviem, rekord, rektor, repressii, reptilija, respirator, respublika, referat, ritm, ritorika, ritual, rodeo (loshadinye gonki).

S) salat, saljut, sal'to, sanatorij, sanskrit, sarkofag, satellit, satira, satisfakcija, sahar, segment, sekret, sekta, sektor, seminar, seminarija, senat, serpantin, sertifikat, sessija, simfonija, simulirovat', simuljacija, singuljarnost', singuljarnyj, sinod, sir, skal'p, skal'pel', skandal, skarabej, skeptik, skepticheskij, skipetr, skul'ptura, skuter, smal'ta, soitie, solidarnost', soljarij, somnambula, social'nyj, spazm, spirt, spora, sport, stabil'nost', stabil'nyj, stagnacija, stal', stancija, start, statika, statichnyj, status, statuja, stela, steril'nyj, stoik, stoicheskij, stomatologija, strategija, struktura, subbota, summa, super- (kak pristavka k slovam), shizma, sjer.

T) taksi, takt (to est' ritmichno), tarelka, Tartar, teatr, tekstura, teleskop, temp, temperatura, teologija, teorema, teorija, terapija, terapevt (vrach), termometr, termos, test, tehnika, tehnologija, titry, tolerantnyj, travma, tragedija, traktat, tranzit, trankvilizator, transkripcija, transmissija, transplantacija, transport, transfer, tribunal, tropik (na globuse), turbulentnost', turizm, turist.

U) uzurpacija, urbanizm, urna, urolog (vrach), utilizacija.

F) fabrika, fajl, falanga, fallos, fal'sifikacija, fal'sh', famil'jarnost', fanatik, fanatizm, faraon, farmakologija, farmacevtika, fizika, fiziologija, file, filologija, final, finish, flag, flot, flotilija, fluktuacija, forma, fort, fortifikacija, frakcija, front, frukt, fundament, furija, fut, futbol.

H) harizma, hartija (kak dokument i kak bumaga), hiromantija, holl, hronika (istoricheskaja), hronicheskij (naprimer, bol'noj), hronologija, hronometr, hrustal'.

C) cenz, cenzura, centr, "civil'nyj" (kostjum, naprimer), cirkuljacija, citadel', citata, citirovat'.

Sh) shampanskoe, shirma, shkala, shkola, shrift, shtamp (shtempel'), shtandart.

Je) jedikt, jekzal'tacija, jekskrementy, jeksperiment, jekspert, jeksport, jekspropriacija, jekstaz, jelastichnyj, jelevator, jelegija, jellips, jempirika, jempiricheskij, jenergija, jenergichnyj, jenciklopedija, jepigraf, Jerot (Jeros), jerotika, jerudit, jerudicija, jetap.

Ju) jumor, jurist, juridicheskij, justicija.

And so on...

  • Let's say about Sanskrit. In the book "Cossacks-arias: from Russia to India," we provided a vivid dictionary of parallels between Russian and Sanskrit that we compiled (also see our website chronologia.org). In this book, we supplement it with references to studies by other authors. I must say that the fact of the closest connection between Russian and Sanskrit is generally well known to specialists. Since the XIX century. At the same time, today it is not customary to speak loudly about this amazing closeness. They pretend that this fact, they say, "does not mean anything special." After all, Sanskrit was used, they say, for many, many, many centuries before the Slavs appeared on the historical scene. Thus, in fact, recognizing that the "oldest" Sanskrit lies at the heart of Indo-European languages,at the same time, historians in every possible way shy away from discussing its practical identity with the old Slavic one. Since then it turns out that the foundation of many "ancient" and modern languages ​​is Slavic. But historians can not allow this to happen. Therefore, calling the "Sanskrit-parent" is actually the Old Slavic language, made a crafty substitution.
  • We repeat that the parallels we found are not "mathematical considerations." Such parallels are sometimes unsteady, and we do not insist on them. The fact is that the meaning of ancient words and concepts could “float” when moving from language to language, which makes analysis difficult. The reader should remember this.


Next: Chapter 1.