How It Really Was/Reconstruction of genuine history/12th century

From Alternative Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Second Rome or the Romaic Czar-Grad empire. Yoros = Jerusalem = Troy[edit | edit source]

As afore mentioned, the most ancient kingdom, of which survive only the vaguest of records, is The Ancient First Rome or Old Rome in the Nile Valley. In the Scaliger's version of history, which was created in the 17th century, there was a kingdom in the Nile Valley which was called Egypt. This seems to be incorrect.

The original Biblical Egypt bears no relation to this kingdom. The 'Egypt' of the Old Testament Pentateuch is in fact the Rus-Horde (the Russian-Horde Empire) of 1300-1500. [6v1], ch.4. But hereafter the Biblical name Egypt=Gypt=Kipchak was ascribed to Africa and attributed to a truly ancient Kingdom in the Nile Valley. This resulted in confusion.

In the 900-1000 the capital of this Kingdom moves to the city of Yoros on the Asiatic shore of the Bosphorus. We will provisionally call it The Second Rome, aka Jerusalem of the Gospels, aka 'ancient' Troy. Then the capital moved to Rus, to Yaroslavl Veliky Novgorod, aka 'ancient' Rome. This in total was The Third Rome, which the majority of 'ancient authors' consider to be the first disregarding the previous incarnations. After a while the capital of the Empire returned to Bosphorus, but not to its former location, it moved to the other side of Bosphorus, to its European shore, not its Asiatic shore. It was there that medieval Constantinople emerged, aka medieval Czar-Grad of the end of 1300-1400, subsequently - Turkish (Ottoman) Istanbul. Overall it was The Fourth Rome, or in a shorter count the second. As we know Moscow was subsequently called the Third Rome (according to the short count). In some old texts Tsar-Grad was referred to as Kiev. That is why some of the significant historical events in 'Kiev' in fact unfolded in Tsar-Grad on the Bosphorus.

To summarise,

  1. Rome: the Nile Valley (Alexandria, Cairo)
  2. Rome: Yoros = Jerusalem = Troy
  3. Rome: Vladimir-Suzdal Rus = Veliky Novgorod (Yaroslavl, Vladimir) = Rome of Enei-Rurik
  4. Rome: Constantinople
  5. Rome: Moscow

But when in the 16th century Romes were counted, where Moscow was numbered as the Third Rome (and not the Fifth), they have clearly started counting not from the deep antiquity of African Egypt, but from Rome of Enei-Rurik, i.e. from Yaroslavl, from the Empire of the great conquest epoch: Veliky Novgorod First Rome, Constantinople Second Rome, Moscow Third Rome. Hereafter the historians replaced Veliky Novgorod with Rome in Italy and the present picture panned was formed. To repeat: the original Biblical Jerusalem (the city of Yoros) is situated on the eastern, Asiatic shore of Bosphorus, closer to the Black Sea, very near to the Beykoz mountain (Golgotha) set kind golgotha place.

Turks resting on Beykoz mountain

In 2006 in front of the entrance to the Yoros fortress there remained to this day a shield bearing a name: Fortress Yoros in Turkish: Yoros kalesi. It is notable that you come across this name literally every step in the immediate vicinity of the fortress. For example, a street leading to the fortress, a restaurant situated close to the fortress, etc.- all bear the name Fortress Yoros. But YOROS (IOROS) is a simple abbreviation of JEROSALEM. By the way, in Latin this word is also spelled with an 'o' - Hierosolyma. The picture shows an old painting, apparently from the 1700-1800, depicting the Turks resting on Beykoz mountain close to 'the grave of holy Jesus (Yusha or Yusa)'. The undoubtable focal point of the whole composition is the picturesque remains of an imposing age-old fortress. It stands on the very shore of the Bosphorus on a hill next to Beykoz. The impressive ruins of the old Yoros fortress survive to this day. Thus the Turkish name of this old fortress on the Bosphorus - Yoros (Ioros), precisely corresponds with the first half of the word IEROSALIM in its old pre-reform spelling. Moreover this fortress is located PRECISELY in the very place where the Biblical Jerusalem was supposed to be situated according to our research.

The fortifications of Yoros, the remains of which are visible today, were built in 1261 A.D. In fact, the distance from Yoros-Jerusalem to the top of Beykoz-Golgotha is about two hours walk, which corresponds well with the Gospels. Surprisingly we could not find the name of 'Yoros' in the Bosphorus on any modern map which we have seen. On many maps the Yoros Fortress is not marked at all, despite its imposing size. On other maps it is marked under completely different names, not at all resembling the word 'Ierosalim'. However, when we asked an archaeologist from Istanbul if he knew of the fortress Yoros outside Istanbul, he replied that yes, he knew it, and that this old Christian fortress is well known to the regional historians and locals. It turns out that historians cartographers are attempting to conceal important information, which can cause 'awkward' questions or plant the seeds of doubt about the validity of Scaliger's version of history.

We discovered that the same city on the Asiatic shore of the Bosphorus (at its Northern exit into the Black Sea) was called by a number of names:

  1. Yoros, i.e. Jerusalem.
  2. Chrisople, i.e. City of Christ (City of Gold).
  3. P+Christo (PChristo), meaning quite clearly: City of Christ (Polis + Christo).
  4. Sanctuary of the god Jupiter (Zeus), sending fair winds.
  5. Simply 'Sanctuary'.

We see one of these names on the old maps.

ChristAndRiver.jpg

Incidentally it is interesting to look carefully at the representation of the crucifiction. It appears that in many paintings, icons and frescoes Christ's crucifiction is shown with a background of either a big sea strait or a wide river. Besides the artists were painting in particular either a strait or a river, but by no means a sea. So, by depicting water, the opposite shore was always shown. As we understand it now, it could not have been otherwise, as the Beykoz mountain is situated right on the shore of the wide Bosphorus. From there can be seen very clearly the European shore of the strait, where the centre of Constantinople is situated, which could have been also considered the Biblical Jerusalem later on, when the capital was relocated here from the city-fortress Yoros. Any artist, had a more or less accurate recollection of the original story, would have depicted the Bosphorus strait as a significant part of the landscape, which served as a backdrop to the site of Christ's crucifiction.

The strategic location of Yoros-Jerusalem is ideal. It controlled the narrowest part of the Bosphorus close to the entrance into the Black Sea. Subsequently, it is conceivable, that at the end of the 14th century, during the relocation of the Empire's capital from Ancient Rome (i.e. Vladimir-Suzdal Rus of the 1200-1300) to New Rome = Constantinople by Dmitriy Donskoy=Constantine the Great, the location of the new capital was slightly moved in relation to ancient Yoros/Troy/Jerusalem towards the Marble Sea and relocated it to the European shore of the Bosphorus, where there was a flatter terrain.

But let's go back to the 12th century. The power of Romea in the 1000-1100 spreads over many regions in the West and the East, where the femas-provinces of Tsar-Grad are located. Generally speaking each fema was an independent state formation, but was headed by a Romaic legate - a king, a tsar or a duke. He was a vassal of Biblical Jerusalem = Tsar-Grad (Yoros) in the Bosphorus. Among such femas-provinces were: African Egypt, Rus-Horde, territories of Western Europe, where consequently (in the 1500-1600) there would emerge Germany, Italy, England and Spain, etc. The subordination of these femas to the imperial centre was reasonably flexible. One of the characteristics of such vassal state was the payment of tax to Jerusalem = Tsar-Grad (Yoros). Besides, starting in the end of the 12th century, the femas were united by shared Christian religion. Tsar-Grad universally recognized as the religious centre of the Kingdom as a whole. It could be that the word 'fema' or 'TEMA' has a connection with a Horde-Tatar word 'Tumen', i.e. a Russian word 'T'MA', which denoted a military unit (t'ma = many).

Independent local history in femas was hardly recorded. Meanwhile chronicles are being written only in Tsar-Grad, as the capital of the Kingdom. They mainly reflect the events which interested Jerusalem=Troy in the Bosphorus. Copies of these chronicles sometimes emerge in some of the Romaic femas-provinces. But these texts mainly tell us about the events in the metropolis. And only fleetingly about local events.

Jerusalem = Tsar-Grad (Yoros) in the Bosphorus in the 1000-1100 was the capital of a strong Romaic Kingdom. We should also note the brilliant strategic position of the later Istanbul as well, its formidable defences. The gigantic walls of Constantinople, which in places have several rows, were repeatedly rebuilt and reinforced [5v].Its impressive remains survive intact) to this day.

Birth of Christ in 1152 and his crucifiction in Tsar-Grad in 1185[edit | edit source]

In the 12th century significant events take place, as described in the Gospels: the coming of Jesus Christ, his life and crucifiction, although the existing text of the Gospels was edited and most likely dates to the 1300-1400. In the mid 12th century, in the year 1152, Jesus Christ is born. In secular Byzantine history he is known as Emperor Andronicus and St. Andrew the Apostle the First-Called. In Russian history he was portrayed as the Great Prince Andrey Bogolyubsky. To be more specific, Andrey Bogolyubsky is a chronicular counterpart of Andronicus-Christ during his stay in Vladimir-Suzdal Rus of the 12th century, where he spent most of his life. In fact the Star of Bethlehem blazed in the middle of the 12th century. This gives us an absolute astronomical dating of Christ's Life. Star of Bethlehem is an explosion of a supernova, which at present is incorrectly dated to the middle of the 11th century. The present-day Crab Nebula in the Taurus Constellation is the remnant of this explosion.

Could there be such a date amidst the absolute astronomic dating, which would accurately correspond to the crucifiction of Christ at the end of the 12th century? After all, it is entirely possible that such a significant event would be immortalised in some astronomical image, let's say on a zodiac with a horoscope. For example, in 'Ancient' Egypt, near the Empire tsars' burial ground. Let us turn to the results for the dating of the 'ancient'-Egyptian zodiacs which we have previously calculated. You will recall, that the crucifiction of Jesus Christ took place during the days of Jewish Passover, not long from the first vernal full moon.

Osiris Zodiac

CONCLUSION. Among the zodiacs dated by us, there is one, which gives the exact date of the Jewish Passover = the date of the first day of the vernal full moon. We are referring to a famous Circular Denderah zodiac or, as it is also called, Osiris Zodiac. This Zodiac gives us the date of the Passover - the morning of the 20th March 1185, and perfectly corresponds with the date of crucifiction of Jesus Christ in year 1185. Besides, the date of the Circular Zodiac corresponds well with the dating of the Star of Bethlehem, which appeared approximately around year 1150, as it allows for Christ's age to be approximately

In fact 'Osiris Zodiac' means 'Zodiac of Christ', as, according to our research, the 'ancient'-Egyptian god Osiris represented Jesus Christ. The Virgin Mary, the mother of Andronicus-Christ, was originally from Rus. It's no coincidence that in the ancient documents Rus' was sometimes referred to as the House of Holy Mother of God. Afterwards Mary lived in Tsar-Grad = 'ancient' Troy. Andronicus-Christ and Mary spent a lot of time in Rus'. They fled there, i.e. return to their motherland, escaping persecution in Tsar-Grad. This event was described in the Gospels as the Escape of the Holy Family from King Herod to Egypt.

Biblical 'Egypt', - aka Egypt of the 'ancient' pharaohs is Rus-Horde of the 1200-1500. In a well-known Gospel story, the details of Christ's life after the escape to Egypt, up to his return Jerusalem at the age of approximately 30 years old, are enshrouded in mystery. Most likely, the significant part of that time Andronicus-Christ and his mother spent in Rus. Besides, the name 'India' referred to the whole of Rus-Horde, and not just to the territory of modern Hindustan. It is possible that this is reason why some of the medieval texts, which are today deemed apocryphal, claim that Christ lived in 'India' for a long

Having then returned from Rus back to Tsar-Grad (Yoros), the emperor Andronicus-Christ (according to the Russians chronicles the Great Prince Andrey Bogolyubsky) implemented important state reforms, impeded corruption, made life easier for the common people. Trade and agriculture were booming. But the reforms raised the ire and hatred of the nobility. This resulted in a plot in the capital which led to a bloody rebellion. In 1185 the Emperor Andronicus-Christ was deposed and crucified in Tsar-Grad on the Beykoz mountain = Biblical Golgotha, on the Asiatic shore of the Bosphorus, close to Yoros.

Grave of Yusha
YushaGrave2.jpg

Until now there remained an enormous 'grave', which is known as: 'a grave of Yusha (Jesus)'. Beykoz is the highest of the mountains of the Upper Bosphorus, 180 metres above sea level. It is situated close the ruins of the city and fortress of Yoros (Biblical Jerusalem). 'Yusha's grave' is not the real grave of Jesus Christ, but a large fenced off plot of land, approximately 3 by 17 metres, where Jesus was crucified. This is to say, they commemorated this sacred 'location' [6v2], ch.5. Not far from the grave of holy Yusha Jesus, at the foot of the Beykoz mountain, there are three other enormous graves nearly 7-8 metres long. These are the graves of Kirklar Sultan, Uzun Elviya Leblebici Baba and Akbaba Sultan. On the other side of the Bosphorus, i.e. its European shore, there were, as the local legends say, several similar looking immense graves of the saints. They are, probably, symbolic resting places of the disciples of Jesus Christ. So, on the Beykoz mountain of Tsar-Grad, near Yoros-Jerusalem, there is a miraculously well preserved memorial (possibly reconstructed) providing us with a tangible reminder of the crucifiction of Andronicus-Christ in this very place.

As a result of a coup and a bloody rebellion in 1185 a new dynasty of Angels came to power. It is considered that 'Angel' is in this case a family name. However, it is quite possible that in the times of Andronicus-Christ this word represented the Tsarist officials in general. Hence is derived angels, 'celestial hierarchy', i.e. God's ministers, according to the Holy Bible. It is possible, that the well-known story in the Holy Bible about Satan, an evil angel, who rebelled against God and wished to usurp Him, originated from there.

Let's refer to the Byzantine chronicler Niketas Choniates. In regards to Andronicus-Christ it says, that he was a foreigner, who lived for a long time amongst the barbarians (as we understand he meant - in Rus). Having arrived to Tsar-Grad, he surrounded himself with a barbarian army and introduced barbaric customs into the country. For example, the Russian pantaloons. Now the picture becomes clearer. Andronicus-Christ was the son of Virgin Mary, who was originally from Rus'. It was here in Rus' where Andronicus-Christ spent his childhood. Later he lived in Tsar-Grad. Then he again returned to Rus' and spent many of his adult years here. Perhaps Andronicus-Christ's particular affection towards Rus' wasn't to everyone's liking in Tsar-Grad. And during a tense period of political crisis and rebellion, the matter of Andronicus-Christ's foreign roots surfaced. The rebels started using it to malign the Emperor.

Therefore, the events described in Gospels, took place in Yoros (Jerusalem) in Bosphorus during the second half of the 12th century. And the city of modern Palestine, which today is referred to as Jerusalem, was in fact 'fabricated' from a small Arab settlement called Al-Quds in a rather desolate area in the Middle East not earlier than the 1600 or even the 18th century. It was declared a center of worship. It bears no relation to the events in the Gospel. The falsifiers of the 1600-1800 pursued a clear objective: to relocate on paper! The Gospel events far away from the real Yoros = Jerusalem = Tsar-Grad, in order to cast into oblivion a significant part of authentic history.

To conclude, the emperor Andronicus-Christ, - aka the great Russian prince Andrey Bogolyubsky, aka apostle Andrey Pervozvanny (St. Andrew the First-Called),- was crucified in Yoros = Tsar-Grad = Jerusalem in 1185. The Gospel life of Jesus Christ in GALILEE represents Andronicus' stay in Vladimir-Suzdal Rus, in the suburbs of the city Galitch Kostromskoy, which in a local dialect was pronounced as GALION. Gospel city of CANA in Galilee, therefore, was a Canian or Khahnian settlement in Vladimir-Suzdal Rus.

Consequently, year zero of the era of the 'Year of Our Lord' (AD) was year 1152 AD. Up until the epoch of the 17th century, when writing down the dates, the Roman numeral X, i.e. 'ten', in Latin denoting a century (for example, XI century), was simply the first letter X of the name of Jesus Christ (written in Cyrillic: Ch=X translator's note). That is why initially an abbreviation: 'XI century' meant 'Christ's First century', i.e.: First Century of Christ's Incarnation. Therefore, the letter 'X' was separated from the following numerals with a dot, i.e. they wrote X.I, X.II. etc. That was the way the Christian calendar appeared.

During that epoch all the dates were written down starting with the name of Jesus Christ, i.e. letter 'X' or letter 'I'. The fact is that the Roman numeral I, i.e. 'one', - in the Arabic representation of a year, for example year 1255, initially was the first letter I of the name Jesus. So the expression 'Year I.255' in those distant times meant: 'from Jesus year 255'. Up until the 1500-1600 there remained the tradition of recording dates by the way of: either X. followed by numerals), or I. (followed by numerals), in other words, by separating with a dot letters X and I from the other numerals which represented the date itself. Sometimes J was used instead of I. See multiple examples in the book by A.T.Fomenko 1v, ch.6:12-13

Over many centuries, in the 17th century to be precise, the creation of the 'reformed' version of history began. It aimed to distort the history of the 1000-16th century beyond recognition. In particular it was achieved by distorting the chronology. The first letter X (i.e. Christ) slyly declared to be the representation of 'ten centuries' in the dates, and the first letter I (i.e. Jesus) was purported to represent a 'thousand'. As the result of it the dates were artificially made older by approximately 1000 years. Massive blocks of events of the 1000-17th century 'slid down' by approximately a thousand years. Phantom 'antiquity' thus appeared.

Our conclusion perfectly corresponds with a well-known fact, that the medieval Italians used hundreds to represent centuries: TRECENTE (i.e. YEARS - THREE HUNDREDs)- the 1300, QUATTROCENTE (i.e. YEARS - FOUR HUNDREDs) the 15th century, CINQUECENTE (i.e. YEARS - FIVE HUNDREDs) the 16th century. But then such naming of the centuries INDICATES DIRECTLY THAT THE STARTING POINT FOR COUNTING COMMENCES EXACTLY FROM the 11th century, as it disregards todays conventional method of adding a 'thousand years'. It turns out, that the medieval Italians didn't know any 'thousand years'. As we understand it now, the reason for it was simply because, there was no 'spare thousand years'.

We have described a mechanism of the way of one of the three principle chronological shift originated, approximately by a thousand years. The causes for the other two shifts approximately by 330 and 1800 years are analogous and, besides, can be explained by the mistakes of the chronologists of the 1300-1400, who relied on the erroneous astronomical data and methods. In the book by A.T.Fomenko 1v the chronological shifts were provisionally called the following:

  1. The Roman-Byzantine shift by 330-360 years
  2. The Roman shift by either 1053 or 1153 years
  3. The Greek-Biblical shift by 1780-1880 years.

The Roman-Byzantine shift made the history of Rome-Byzantine longer by forcing it into the past. The Roman shift made the history of the Roman Empire 'more ancient'. The Greek-Biblical shift made the history of Greece and all Biblical history far older by forcing it into the past.

Caesarean section[edit | edit source]

We are all familiar with the medical term 'caesarean section' or 'caesarean'. In other words, when labour does not occur naturally, but by means of an incision in the abdomen. Why is this incision called 'Caesarean'? Because, according to some sources, that was exactly the way Julius Caesar was delivered at birth. For example in an old Russian Palaea we read: The original Roman kingdom of Iulii Kesar. In the third year of Cleopatra's reign Iulii Kesar named VYPOROTOK (meaning 'ripped' or 'torn' - translator's note) started his rule in Rome. The nickname 'vyporotok' could perhaps mean, that he was ripped or torn out of his mother's womb. In other words he was removed by means of a medical procedure through an incision or section. This is the origin of the expression 'caesarean section'. But on the other hand, similar information has survived about Christ too. Though little known today, but clearly expressed in the canonical church service. For example in the old Church Slavonic triadic canon of the second mode, recited on Sundays midnight vespers. Irmos of the ninth song of this canon sounds like this: (in English translation) : Him, who before the Sun - God's lantern shined, and in flesh came FROM VIRGIN'S SIDE, infinitely incarnated, blessed and pure, we praise You, Mother of God. The words: (He) came in flesh from virgin's side are hard to interpret in any other way but as the birth of Christ via caesarean section by Virgin Mary Theotokos. Jesus' birth by the caesarean section left its imprint not only in the liturgical texts of the Orthodox Church. This event was much talked about in the Middle Ages and spawned a multitude of views, theories and myths. The first thing that should be noted is the claim of the orthodox doctrine, that Theotokos (the Birthgiver) REMAINED A VIRGIN AFTER CHRIST'S BIRTH. These words are directly present in the Orthodox sacred worship, see above. Besides, this theme is in detail discussed in so called Apocrypha.

To clarify, prior to the 17th century there were a lot of various pieces of writings about Christ. In the 17th century a new regime prohibited them and declared them to be 'apocryphal'. At the same time many of them were considered canonical enough works even in the 16th century. They formed part of the authoritative canonical books, were copied in the monasteries along with the four canonical Gospels, creation of the holy fathers and Christian catechisms. One of the ways of disparaging the 'inconvenient texts' in the 17th century was the following: they started to name some of the 'irritating sources' - 'Gospels' (although they were not called that in the Church Slavonic tradition). For example they began to call the works attributed to Thomas the Apostle 'Gospel according to Thomas'. The idea is clear. The reformists were achieving the following goal: in the Christian world it was well known that in one of the Ecumenical Councils the four canonical Gospels, deemed appropriate for worship, were selected. The Gospels were the texts that ought to be read in the church. And, clearly, they ought to be officially approved. In this sense all the other Gospels were renounced But it didn't mean that they were rejected entirely. They could remain as so called reference books. They could be kept at home and copied. But cunning reformists, by attaching the name 'Gospel' to any old text which displeased them, automatically labelled them as 'incorrect, forbidden Gospels'. Let's refer to so called 'Infancy Gospel of Thomas': And found (Joseph Ath.) a cave there And appeared the new-born, emerged and took breast of his mother Mary. And exclaimed and old woman and she came out of the cave and met Salome, and said to her: Salome, Salome, I would like to tell you about a MIRACLE: A VIRGIN GAVE BIRTH AND KEPT HER VIRGINITY.

Here is another text called 'Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew'. 'And when Zeloma approached Mary, she cried out loudly: I have never thought or heard of anything like this: Her breast is full of milk and She has a baby boy, though SHE IS A VIRGIN. There was nothing impure at the conception and NO SICKNESS IN BIRTH. She conceived being a virgin, GAVE BIRTH AS A VIRGIN, AND REMAINS A VIRGIN. Such an insistent claim in the sources, that Theotokos (Birthgiver) REMAINED A VIRGIN AFTER GIVING BIRTH corresponds perfectly with Christ's birth via caesarean section. As it happens, Christ is also mentioned in the Talmud. Although, the image of Jesus presented by the Talmud is a combination of various Judaic legends, rabbis' commentaries and simply rumours. It is considered that Jesus appears in the Talmud under different names. The name of JESUS, SON OF PANTERA (PANTIRA) is mentioned several times... the origin of the name "son of Pantera" presents us with a conundrum.

In regards to PANTERA scholars write: The etymology of the non-Jewish name Pantera has for many years presented a challenge to researchers... A theory was put forward, that the name Pantera (Pantira) appeared as a result of a linguistic mistake in the form of an incorrect reproduction of a Greek word 'parthenos' - 'virgin' .

In our opinion the Greek word PARTHENOS, i.e. VIRGIN (and this is exactly how the word VIRGIN sounds in the Greek Gospels), has appeared in the Christian tradition as a recollection of the caesarean section of Christ's birth. The word PARTHENOS originated from a Slavonic word POROT', meaning 'to rip open', 'to cut the body' when performing the caesarean section. Furthermore, perhaps it contains a meaning of not only TO CUT OPEN, but also TO SEW UP, as PARTHENOS reminds us of a word PORTNOI (meaning A TAILOR), i.e. a person, who cuts and sews up. Naturally, after performing a caesarean section a doctor has to sew the wound up.

And Talmudic PANTERA (PANTIRA), most likely, originates (as does PARTHENOS) from the same Slavonic word POROT'(TO CUT OPEN), PORTNOI (A TAILOR). That is why the authors of the 19th century, who associated this word with PARTHENOS, were correct. But then immediately comes to mind a well-known myth about the birth of the 'most ancient' goddess Athena 'via a cut in Zeus' head'. Since long ago scientists became aware of the similarity between the 'ancient' Greek Athena Parthenos and medieval Christian Theotokos of Athenes. In the medieval times the famous Athenian Parthenon was nothing other than a Temple of the Virgin Mary Theotokos. Besides, Athena was also called PALLAS. The word Pallas means A VIRGIN.zThe 'ancient' Greek myths constantly emphasise that Athena was A VIRGIN.

So the Christian origin of the myth about Athena's birth is thus lucidated. 'Zeus... swallowed whole his pregnant wife and afterwards with the help of Hephaestus (or Prometheus), who cleaved Zeus's head with the axe, he sired Athena who leaped from Zeus's head, fully armed, with a warlike cry'.

The Blessed Virgin Mary

Through these fantastical details can be dimly perceived the birth of Jesus by caesarean section from the Virgin Mary. Here Virgin = Athena 'changes places' with Jesus = Zeus: but the Virgin doesn't give birth to Jesus, but Jesus (Zeus) gives birth to the Virgin. The incision in the 'Greek' myth wholly remains, but 'moves' to the god's head. Incidentally, another character is also mentioned here a doctor, who performed the incision. He was called Prometheus or Hephaestus This most 'ancient' of Greek myths could have appeared while observing the Orthodox icon 'The Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary'.

The Virgin Mary is on her deathbed, Christ stands above her and holds in his hands, at his shoulder level, a tiny figure of the Virgin Mary swaddled in a white piece of cloth. Surely, a person, who knows icon-painting well, understands that this small figure symbolises here The Virgin Mary's soul. But a lay person and moreover a visitor from afar, who knows little about the tradition of icon-painting, could easily interpret such an image as the birth of a little maiden from an adult God. Next the imagination would take over. As a girl was painted close to Christ's head it 'therefore meant that she was born from the head'. And so on. Having returned home, to 'ancient' Greece of the 1300-1500 from a distant capital of the Great = 'Mongol' Empire, the awed traveler would share with his fellow citizens is 'deep knowledge' about the life of the Olympian gods on faraway Olympus. That is how an 'ancient' myth could have been born. It was Rus that was considered to be 'Virgin Mary's Home' as she had spent the significant part of her life in Rus' and died there.That is why the images of 'Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary' originated in Rus'. And later, as Christianity was progressing in Western Europe, the images, inspired by these Orthodox icons, appeared there as well. But let us return to Zeus. It appears, that he gave birth not only to Athena, but also to Dionysus=Bacchus: Having disguised himself as a mortal, Zeus had a secret love affair with Semele ('Earth') ... Hera... advised Semele, who was already six months pregnant, to demand her of her mysterious lover to reveal his true form... He came to her wreathed in bolts of lightning and roars of thunder and incinerated her. However, Hermes managed to save her six months premature son. Hermes SEWED A BABY INTO ZEUS' THIGH, AND AFTER THREE MONTHS, IN DUE TIME ZEUS GAVE BIRTH TO HIM. Hence Dionysus is called 'twice-born' or 'a child of double doors' .

In this myth, as in the Judaic texts, Christ kind sort of gives birth to himself from his thigh. Here Zeus is Jesus, and Dio-nysus = Nicaean God is also Jesus. The commentators explained such parallels by purportedly adopting the doctrines of Christianity from the more archaic pagan beliefs. But in the new chronology the picture is reverse. Pagan cultures were variations of Christianity, common in the Middle Ages. Besides the mainstream of Christianity, there existed various sects and cults. They were later declared to be "the most 'ancient pagan' religions". And then, already in the 19th century, they were surprised to discover that they suspiciously resembled Christianity. A vast platform opened for the 'scientific explanation' of this phenomenon. Given examples (many others are pointed out in our books of the 'golden series' B) illustrate how wide spread the myth of the birth of Jesus by caesarean section really is. This event generated a multitude of versions, notably in places of wide ranging geographic and linguistic diversity.

The biblical story of the magi reflects the adoration of Rus-Horde to Andronicus-Christ in the 12th century. The introduction of Christianty to Russia[edit | edit source]

In the epoch of Christ, in the second half of the 12th century, Rus adopted Christianity wholly and instantly, and did not wait for a thousand year as the Scaligerian-Romanovian history assures us. Russian Czar Vladimir = Vladeyushyi Mirom (meaning 'One Who Rules the World' translator's note), Csaritsa (Queen) Malka and Cossak Military Commander Ataman (military rank in Cossack regiments tr. note) all came to worship Christ. They are represented in the Gospel as The Magi or The Three Kings, under the names of Balthazar, Melchior and Caspar. Afterwards a magnificent Cologne Cathedral was erected in their honor, where the famous sarcophagus of the Three Kings was placed. The shrine could be symbolic, and the Kings themselves buried in the central Imperial Burial Ground of African Egypt.

Medieval images survive which depict the Adoration of the Biblical Magi to the infant Christ set against a background of banners displaying A CRESCENT AND A STAR. This is a visual reminder that the Gospel events took place specifically in Czar-Grad = Yoros = Biblical Jerusalem. It was still a recent memory for some of the artists of the 1100-1600 and when depicting the Gospel events they painted [Star and crescent|a crescent with a star]], which was a widely recognised symbol of Czar-Grad.

Thus Cologne Cathedral was built not in honor of some obscure shepherds, but was dedicated to the powerful Czars Magi = 'Mongols', who were the first to greet Christ and accept him and spread Christianity in their country. It was Scythia-Horde-Rus (modern day Russia, translator's note), which to our days is the largest country in the world, where Orthodox Christianity was established and remains until now. The important role attributed to the relics of the Magi-Czars in the medieval times now becomes clearer. They were not just common normal Czars, but rulers, who established Christianity as the STATE RELIGION OF THE GREATEST AND MOST POWERFUL EMPIRE OF THE MIDDLE AGES, i.e. 'The Mongolian' Empire. Incidentally, this has also included Germany, where Cologne Cathedral is situated. Having colonized Western Europe, The Russian Horde Empire represented by the Emperor Barbarossa (Barbarian Ross) - could easily have created there a centre of worship for their Saintly Czars-Three Wise Men-Magi. Later, after the fall of the Empire, it was partly forgotten or intentionally obfuscated. The same purpose was served by the tendentious 'restorations' of the Shrine of Three Magi in the 1600-1700

Three Magi

We have discovered a remarkable fact, which proves our identification of the 'Magus Melchior' with the Russian-Horde Queen Malka, mother to the prince Vladimir. In late Christian literature, art and sculptures, the three Magi are portrayed as MEN (MALE). However, in the Shrine the two Magi are portrayed as men with beards, but the third figure standing between them is CLEARLY FEMALE.

Queen Melchior

Notably in many old depictions the Queen Melchior is presented as a white European woman. In some European cathedrals this tradition survived even up until the 19th century. But then, following changes in church policy and in compliance with the new views on history, the artists started distorting the female features and turning the Slavic Queen into a Black Queen and then into a Black King. Furthermore, it is curious, that some images of the Magi in Cologne Cathedral are of a strongly pronounced Slavic type. Now it becomes clear. Here (in the picture) are portrayed the King and the Queen from Rus-Horde. Later on, following the changes in the situation in Europe in the 1600-1700, Western Europeans became hyper-sensitive to the Slavic origins of the Magi = 'Mongols'. In later depictions the Magi's Slavic facial type was beginning to be altered. The female Queen was being turned into a man. She was given moustache, for example in the Altar painting by Stefan Lochner allegedly of the 15th century in Cologne Cathedral.

Why did a fair-haired Slavic woman later turn into a negro woman? And then into a negro man. It is possible, that the Western Europeans mixed up two Russian words: CHERNYI (meaning BLACK) and CHERMNYI (meaning RED). In the Russian language there are well-known expressions: 'krasna devitsa' meaning a beautiful, fine girl; 'Red square' meaning a beautiful square. The chances are that the great queen was called 'beautiful'.

The Russian expression 'red, beautiful queen' could have been, quite possibly, misinterpreted by the foreigners, who by then couldn't remember Russian very well, and from CHERMNAYA TSARITSA (meaning BEAUTIFUL QUEEN)turned into CHERNAYA TSARITSA (meaning BLACK QUEEN). A black queen is of course, a negro - a notion assumed by medieval artists and confidently executed with their brushes... The transformation into a male remains on the conscience of recent commentators.

To conclude, the relics of the Three Magi-'Mongols' were originally kept in a magnificent golden sarcophagus in Cologne Cathedral:

  1. the great Russian prince VLADIMIR (Balthazar), who introduced Russia to Christianity
  2. his mother the princess MALKA (Melchior)
  3. his commander-khan, the Cossack ataman CASPAR = COSSAK. In the Old Testament he was called Assyrian Rabsak, i.e. the Russian Caspar, if read backwards.

They were among the first who visited and accepted Jesus Christ in 12th century and that is why they were respectably described as the Magi in the Gospels and partially in the Old Testament. They introduced Christianity to Rus-Scythia. Afterwards they were sanctified. The famous Cologne Cathedral was erected purposefully as the shrine of these Magi - 'Mongols'. The foundation of Goth = 'gothic' Cologne House (as Cologne-Colony itself) was laid down during the 'Mongolian' conquest of Western Europe, aka the 'ancient Roman conquest of Europe. The Magi's relics were brought to Cologne-Colony on the order of the Czar BARBARIAN-RUSSIAN OR BEARDED RUSSIAN, i.e. Barbarossa.

Then having 'consigned' Christ's life a thousand years into the past from the 12th century to the 1st century, Scaligerian history did its best to erase from the memory of the future generations the important fact, that The Kings-Magi in reality were the great='Mongolian' czars of Rus-Scythia, who have baptized Russia.

The crusades as revenge for Christ's death[edit | edit source]

Christ's execution in 1185 in Czar-Grad triggered a violent reaction in both the capital itself and in the regions-femas of the Romaic Empire. Especially in Russia, the motherland of Mary Mother of God. At the end of the 12th century it was Rus who was at the lead the Crusades, which march to Czar-Grad in order to avenge Christ's execution and punish the perpetrators. A bitter war breaks out which was later multiplied in the Scalgerian version of history under a variety of names. In particular it is known to us as the famous 'ancient' Trojan war allegedly of 13th century BC, and also as the Crusade of the 1100-1200. It appears, that 'IN THE END OF the 11th century THE CRUSADERS WERE CONVINCED THAT THEY WERE AVENGING NOT THE DESCENDANTS OF THE SAVIOR'S EXECUTIONERS, BUT THESE EXECUTIONERS THEMSELVES'.

This fact is of great significance. In reality the events took place a century later: at the end of the 12th century beginning of the 13th century. The start of the so called First Crusade, i.e. Crusade 'to rescue the Holy Sepulchre', today is erroneously dated to year 1096, instead of approximately year 1196. On the other hand, the medieval church sources, for example, 'Skazaniye o strasti Spasove' ('Passions of our Lord') and 'Pilate's Letter to Tiberius', assert that immediately after Jesus' Resurrection, Pilate was summoned to Rome where he was executed. Caesar's army went on a Crusade to Jerusalem and seized it. It is considered today to be vapid medieval conjecture, as according to the Scaligerian chronology, there was no Roman Crusade to Jerusalem in the third decade of the I century. However, now the sources' testimony literally makes sense. They were referring to the Crusades of the late 12th century early 13th century specifically the so called Forth Crusade in 1204, during which Czar-Grad (Yoros) was conquered.

Afterwards the later chronologists, mislead by the centennial chronological shift, moved the Crusade to the end of the 11th century. One of the many repercussions of this was the appearance of a phantom Crusade of supposedly year 1096, when Jerusalem was conquered.

Savior Not-Made-by-Hands. Sudarium and the Turin Shroud[edit | edit source]

In 1998 a report about the radiocarbon dating of the famous Christian relic, The Turin Shroud, resonated strongly with a public. It is considered that this fragment of cloth still bears some traces of crucified Christ, allegedly from the 1st century. HOWEVER, THE RADIO-CARBON DATING GAVE A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT DATE: APPROXIMATELY THE 11TH CENTURY-12TH CENTURY. The radiocarbon analyses were conducted in three laboratories of The Oxford University, Arizona State University and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (Zurich).

The radiocarbon dating of the Shroud to the mid 12th century corresponds well with other independent dates of Christ's life, arrived at by us. It should be said, that we have a rather critical attitude towards the results of radiocarbon dating. This method is still very inaccurate - dating of artefacts which are up to 2000 years old can give rise to unforeseeable mistakes, which correspond badly with the artefact's true age! Besides, when ordering a radiocarbon dating of any given artefact, the archaeologists often inform the laboratory beforehand of the estimated age of the sample, and physicists only 'specify' it, by selecting the 'desired date' from a spectrum of the obtained radiocarbon dates (which objectively have a broad range). However, the situation with the dating of The Shroud is somewhat different. The samples of its material were independently dated by several laboratories which allows reliance on their conclusions with a certain degree of confidence. Thus, it is most likely The Turin Shroud is an invaluable original of the 12th century, which has fortuitously survived till nowadays.

Turin Shroud imagined by Western artists

From the point of view of the new chronology the story of the Turin Shroud, i.e. Acheiropoieta Image looks like this. The body of Christ was enwrapped in it in 1185. Then, after some time, it turned up in Russia. Here it was kept folded so, that on the outside only The Holy Face, which was depicted on many Russian icons, was visible. As the Shroud remained in Russia, the icons of the Acheiropoieta Image were painted mainly by Russian artists. In the West such images were less wide spread. The Western artists imagined the story of the Shroud somewhat differently. In Russia the icon The Image of the Savior Not-Made-By-Hands was also used as a military banner and a holy banner. The Savior thus depicted embellished the banners of Yaroslavl, Tver' and Moscow Princes, acted as the defender of the Russian Soil and the protector of Russian armies. They fought under His banner during the Battle of Kulikovo.

Considering that The Shroud remained in Russia, it becomes clear why it is precisely here, where the special ceremony of The Adoration of the Shroud during the Holy Week originated. It doesn't exist at all in the Catholic Church. The Russian church service incorporates the carrying of The Shroud out of the church during the Procession of the Cross on Good Friday. But, most likely, the original Shroud was not usually disturbed. In place of the original one of its numerous replicas were used, which were kept in every church. The original, judging by the creases on it, was carefully kept folded, so that only the face of Christ could be seen. That is why it was called the Image Not-Made-By-Hands or the Sudarium. During The Great Revolt of the 17th century, many Moscow treasures, ransacked in the tumult of the rebellion and occupation, found the way to the West. It is probable, that it was in the 17th century when the Shroud was damaged by a fire and burnt in several places. These singes from the fire are still visible today. The Shroud found its way to Turin in Italy allegedly in 1578.

It is possible that even earlier there existed some other Shroud in Turin. As there are several allegedly authentic Shrouds known of in the West. But the original Shroud found itself in Turin, in our opinion, only in the 17th century. In fact, a special shrine was built for it and it was placed in Turin Cathedral only in the 1694. According to the new chronology, such a date the end of the 17th century is very telling. It was then, after the crushing defeat of Razin and vanquishing of the Turks under Vienna, when it became clear that the era of the Great Empire was passing, and that Russia-Horde was no longer to be feared, and that at last, the seized treasures and relics of the Horde could be released from their chests, including the Shroud, without fearing that the former owners would return and reclaim them.

Mark the evangelist[edit | edit source]

The magnificent Saint Mark's Basilica in Venice is the adornment of the city and one of the most popular buildings in Italy. Its history is extremely interesting in the light of the new chronology. It appears, that the first evangelist Mark lived in the 12th century, died in its second half and was buried for the first and the last time in St. Mark's Basilica, which was specially erected in his honour. This lavish burial of Mark allegedly in 1094 (most likely circa 1194) with the participation of the Doge, Patriarch and all of the people was later interpreted by the historians as supposedly 'the rediscovery' of his remains 'a millennium later' as Scaligerian chronology has already shifted the time of Mark's life to the 1st century.

There were no mysterious vanishing and miraculous reappearances of Mark's relics 'a thousand years later'. These cunning legends were made up later, when the historians had already started to coordinate Scaligerian chronology with the evidence of the old documents, that pointed to the 1100-1200 as the epoch of Mark the Evangelist's activity.

Saint Mark's Basilica in its modern state was completed significantly later than the 12th century. Today we see the cathedral which was completed not earlier than 16th century. The rest of the evangelists also lived and wrote at the end of the 12th century beginning of the 13th century.

Two branches of the original Christianity[edit | edit source]

Following the crucifiction of Andronicus-Christ in Czar-Grad in Bosphorus two branches of Christianity emerged. The first branch, which we will provisionally call 'royal or ancestral Christianity', was the religion of the RELATIVES OF ANDRONICUS-CHRIST. This was the Christianity of the royal family, the Empire's ruling ancestral clan, but not the religion of the common people. Inside the clan, as in any family, there were disputes. After the Crusade in 1204 those of his relatives who came to believe in Him as a God came to power. But they also regarded their own persona as holy given that God Andronicus-Christ was their relation. The 'ancient'-Egyptian artefacts and imagery convey to us the atmosphere of this ancestral Christianity, i.e. - the memorials of the royal family burial site. Egyptian Christ-Osiris, his worst enemy Set, his wife-mother Isida, etc. were close relatives. Occasionally they fought between themselves, killed and persecuted each other, but nonetheless their relationship remained ancestral.

We can see a similar picture in the 'ancient'-Greek pantheon of the Olympic Gods, where Zeus is another representation of Jesus Christ. The Olympic Gods were related, though it still did not rule out wars between them, machination or conspiracies. But in the course of any clashes it was never forgotten that the conflicting sides were godly, which vastly differentiated them from the rest of the world. The same viewpoint was shared by the 'ancient'- Egyptian gods.

But Christ, aka Emperor Andronicus, bequeathed a school of his disciples-apostles. They have created a fundamentally different branch of the original Christianity, namely THE APOSTOLIC CHURCH. If we refer to modern Christianity, we will see that this is exactly what it's called. The Christian Church today and for a long time has stressed that it is specifically the APOSTOLIC CHURCH. The persistency of this claim itself makes one think, that at some point there also existed some other Christian Church. Why emphasise this fact so intensely and constantly, if no other movement apart from the Apostolic one existed?

The Apostolic movement, unlike the first one, ancestral one, was, so to say, of the people. It seems that the only representative of the royal family in the Apostolic Christianity was Our Lord's Brother Jacob. But he was soon murdered, after which the primacy passed on to the Apostles of the common descent to Peter and Paul.

At first there were no fundamental differences between the two branches of Christianity, but they have soon appeared and it is clear why. The ancestral-royal branch of the Christianity was not large, but it commanded absolute power. At first, and for quite a long time, it reigned supremely over the Empire. The Christian Czars in the first centuries of Christianity perceived themselves as relations to God Andronicus-Christ and forced all of the people to venerate them as deities. 'In Paganism was established a system where there existed gods in the heavens and GODS ON EARTH, I.E. THE EMPERORS'. The Christians of the Apostolic Church were forced to offer sacrifices to the gods, i.e. to the living emperors. Many refused. It was they who were to become the first Christian martyrs. If the emperors demanded from the Christians 'the proper veneration', then it most likely meant that the emperors considered the Apostolic Christians to be of the same faith, but having strayed from the true path, which was punished.

To conclude, the Roman Emperors worshiped Christ, calling him Zeus and Jupiter, but at that considered themselves to be Gods too and persistently demanded to be worshiped. The second branch of Christianity - the Apostolic, branch of the people - regarded only Christ to be God and disagreed with the claims of the Royal family, from which Christ originated, to idolize the rulers. A conflict arose. The Royal Christianity began to persecute the Apostolic Christianity. This was the notorious 'Christian ostracism' allegedly in the first centuries AD, i.e. the epoch of the 1200-1300.

The people's Apostolic Christianity, unlike the Ancestral Royal Christianity, was popular on the mass scale and, what's important, could organize itself and created a stable church, which was called Apostolic. In time it has evolved into a powerful organisation, put up a fight against the Royal Christianity, and in the end has won. Constantine the Great, aka czar-khan Dmitriy Donskoy, molds Apostolic Christianity into the state religion of the entire gigantic 'Mongol' Empire. Since then the czars-khans of the Empire ceased to be the Gods. This upheaval took place at the end of 3rd century AC and was far from painless. This matter was resolved in the major Kulikovo Battle in 1380. The great importance, which was given to the Kulikovo Battle and its numerous representations in world history, also becomes clear.

Two writing traditions of Christianity: Apostolic and Ancestral/Royal[edit | edit source]

There were many texts written in both of the branches of original Christianity. They varied. The people's Apostolic Church created the Gospels. We are very familiar with their spirit. The Gospels revere Andronicus-Christ and do not accept any equality with Him. This is a reverence of a disciple for his Teacher. Christ is the Sun, which is unblemished.

In the Ancestral-Royal circle they also were writing a lot (or used chroniclers and writers). Naturally they were writing a lot about their famous ancestor Lord Christ. But the flavour of these texts was essentially different. From them subsequently grew the 'ancient'-Greek myths about Zeus/Christ and his numerous relations Olympian Gods, and also the 'ancient'-Greek legends about God Osiris-Christ and his nine closest gods. Modern commentators refer all such Christian testimonials to an historical period - 'paganism', naturally shifting it back to 'antiquity' and separating it from Christianity.

The differences between the texts of the apostolic tradition and Ancestral-Royal literature were so great, that today researchers have to explain with great difficulty vivid parallels and analogies between the Apostolic Christianity and 'paganism', which emerge repeatedly.

When gold became money[edit | edit source]

A myth of the Argonauts probably tells us about Christ's and his disciples'-apostles' - voyage to the rich gold deposits in Russia. Gold is considered to be the symbol of Christ. Gold is constantly used in the Orthodox Church service. Iconostases, icons and the wooden carving in the cathedrals are gilded with it. The priests' clothings are lavishly embroidered with gold. Cups and icon covers are made of it. Orthodox Churches Domes and crosses on them are coated with gold.

It is possible, that it was exactly in the 12th century, in the times of the Emperor Andronicus-Christ, when gold started widely being used as money. That is why it was gold that became the symbol for money. Argonauts, i.e. Christ's and the apostles' voyage to Russia for gold also becomes clear.

Initially, when people discovered gold, they didn't immediately think of using it as money. Gold doesn't rust. It is a very soft and yielding metal. At first they used to make houseware out of gold. But gold isn't suitable for all weaponry or tools it is too soft. In the view of gold's rarity, its value and convenience in producing houseware, golden goods were extremely valued in ancient times. When the chronicles tell us about robberies or gifts, they often refer to golden vessels, cups, etc. Hence it is evident that in the ancient times it was initially exactly golden houseware which was used as common 'currency'.

Only in time, presumably in the 1100-1200, gold became money in the truest sense of the word accounts were settled with pieces of gold. At first it was weighed, and then they started cutting pieces of a standard weight, which soon led to the appearance of golden and silver coins as a means of payment. And only later, out of poverty in places they started using copper and other inexpensive metals. Their value when re-melted would be negligible. Thus the copper money was nominal, its value was established only by law, which obliged people to accept it as a means of payment.

Wide coining of such 'conventional money', which did not have its own value, as opposed to gold and silver, began only in the 17th century, already after the collapse of the Great Empire. For example, the introduction of the first copper money in Russia in the time of the first Romanovs, in place of previous gold and silver ones, caused violent protests among the Russian population, who were used to REAL MONEY, i.e. golden and silver coins. The notorious 'copper revolts' broke out. Revolts were crushed by force and the new rules forcefully imposed on the people.

Christ was born in Crimea. In the same place Mary Mother of God died[edit | edit source]

The question of where Christ was born preoccupies many people. Today we are assured that the place of His birth was modern Palestine where the city of Bethlehem is located. This name is taken from the Bible. Thus in the Gospels it named as the town where Christ was born. However, we discovered that this theory of historians is incorrect. Most likely The Virgin Mary originally came from Russia. Besides, many authors from 'antiquity' called Andronicus-Christ Etruscan, i.e. Russian. Furthermore, in the Russian-Horde chronicles the Emperor Andronicus-Christ is described as the great prince Andrey Bogolyubskyi, who was born in Russia. Therefore, Andronicus-Christ could have been born somewhere in Russia-Horde.

It turns out that Christ was born in Crimea, in the same place where Mother of God died. We were able 'to calculate' the exact location of Christ's birthplace. It is the famous cape Fiolent (aka the Bethlehem of the Gospels) in Southern Crimea. Crimean Karaites were convinced that the Cradle of the Savior of the World (Christ) is kept in Crimea. It appears that the famous Holy Grail is the Golden Cradle of the Baby Jesus. It remained in Crimea, where apparently it was searched for for a long time. The identification of the Holy Grail with the Golden Cradle of Jesus also has its origins in the legend of King Arthur. Cape Fiolent was visited by the Russian Emperors in order to bow down to this Holy site.

Moreover, we came across an important fact. It appears that an ancient CAVE temple of the Nativity of Christ was found on the Cape Fiolent. This temple as well as the St. George's Monastery has survived many events. It still exists today. A beautiful concurrence with the Gospels arises, according to which, the Nativity took place in a CAVE. It is absolutely clear that in this place there should have appeared a cave temple of the Nativity of Christ. In the whole world there are only a few cave churches of the Nativity of Christ. But it is only about one of them, namely the temple in Fiolent, that so much information, directly connecting it to the Gospel events, has been discovered. It is intriguingly, that in the 20th century in the St. George's Monastery in Fiolent they wanted to restore the ancient rituals-performances in the memory of the Nativity of Christ.

Are there any references to Christ's Golden Cradle that survive in the history of Southern Crimea? After all we are beginning to understand that Jesus was born in Fiolent. That is why such a vivid detail as the Golden Cradle of Baby Jesus-Zeus should have been reflected in the legends of this region. It appears that such references not only exist, but are also well known. But unfortunately, today nobody directly makes the connection to Christ, as the Romanovs enforced eradication of the true Crimean history.

For many centuries until the end of the 19th century there were stories about CRIMEAN PRINCES BEING NURSED IN THE HOLY GOLDEN CRADLE. The cradle was enveloped in incredible veneration; it was guarded and kept safe from the enemies. When the enemies were at close quarters, the holy golden cradle was concealed in the cave. Everything is clear. The cradle in which was reared the Baby Jesus, who was born in Crimea in Crimea circa 1152, on cape Fiolent, became holy to all Christians, primarily to the Christians of Crimea. It's unlikely that the cradle was actually gold. Most likely this is a figment of people's imagination, as Christ was associated with the Sun and Gold. That is why the Cradle was depicted as gold in the icons. Please note, that the Golden Cradle eventually found itself once again in the cave inside the Crimean mountain. Originally, when Jesus-Zeus was born, it was in the mountain cave. And it is there it has returned according to folklore.

It is also clear why the successive Crimean princes and czars were nursed in this cradle. It was thought that the rulers of Crimea would receive some of the power and divinity of the Emperor Andronicus-Christ.

The stories of a Holy Golden Cradle were preserved by the Crimean Karaites. Here it is said directly, that the Savior of the world would grow up in it. Meaning Christ. Most likely, at first not the future, but the past was meant: in this cradle the Savior of the world (Jesus) GREW UP. Then He will appear again during the Last Judgment. The Karaites' legend clearly claims that the Holy Cradle was kept in Crimea and was hidden in the mountain, in its depths, i.e. in a cave. It perfectly corresponds with the fact the Andronicus-Christ was born in the cape Fiolent, in Crimea. Furthermore, Christ was born in a cave. Consequently at first his cradle was also in a cave. Later on as time went by it could have been hidden in a cave once again, as an object that acquired holy status.

There prevails a variety of opinions in the question of where exactly in Crimea the Golden Cradle was hidden. Around a dozen of places of the probable location of the Golden Cradle are known: Kaplu-Kaya, Basman Caves, Cross Mountain (Krestovaya Gora) on the South shore, Beshik-Tau (Mountain) near the cave town of Chufut-Kale ... Thus everybody pointed to the Southern Crimea, but the exact place was forgotten.

We have discovered the place of death and first burial site of Mary Mother of God. It is the famous ancient town of Chufut-Kale in Crimea, not far from Bakhchisaray. Moreover, the earlier correlation between Virgin Mary and the Empress Phaustina discovered by us, has immediately allowed us to identify the place of her death and burial. You will recall that Bakhchisaray is the 'Mongol' capital in Crimean Kanate.

Chufut-Kale is a Crimean cave town. It is closely associated with Virgin Mary. Here are situated the Valley of Mary, City of Mary, Christian necropolis and the remains of a Christian temple. The famous Assumption Monastery is situated near Chufut-Kale. The appearance of the 'live icon' of the Virgin Mary near Chufut-Kale is very well-known, in honour of which the Assumption Monastery was founded. The 'live icon' of the Mother of God is possibly a reminiscence of a personal appearance in Chufut-Kale of Mary Mother of God herself. According to Life of Mary the Mother God, she was buried in the cave. The Assumption Monastery in Chufut-Kale is indeed a cave-monastery.

There are several Assumption Monasteries in Russia. They are dedicated to the Assumption of Mary the Mother of God. But the most famous of them, steeped in numerous legends, is unquestionably the Crimean Assumption Monastery. It is situated in direct proximity to Chufut-Kale. For hundreds of years thousands of pilgrims from different countries have been coming here. As commentators observe, millions of feet have walked the road to the Assumption Monastery. It's all true. As Virgin Mary passed away, we now understand, in Chufut-Kale, it is exactly here where the most cherished main Assumption Monastery should have appeared. And so it did.

Furthermore, the well-known Golden-Horde (Tatar) story of the Queen Dzanike-Khanym is a story of the life, death and Ascension of the Virgin Mary in Chufut-Kale. Today Queen Dzanike-Khanym is ascribed to the 1300-1400. The historians are mistaken. Later authors were confusing the events of the end of the 12th century and the end of the 13th century. That is the Church of Christ and the epoch of Constantine the Great.

A remarkable fact stands out, that throughout the centuries The Russian Emperors and the members of their families came to Chufut-Kale, to the Assumption Monastery and Bakhchisaray to worship. Foreign rulers also visited. Now we understand why. The august persons would come here in order to pay reverence to the places, where Mary the Mother of God had lived and died. Of course over time the heart of the matter was forgotten. However a longstanding tradition to visit these holy places remained unchanged. The people of the 1700-1800 had already forgotten the root of this tradition, but they unswervingly obeyed the ancient custom.

Please note, that none of the Russian crown bearers travelled to Palestinian Jerusalem to worship. They probably well understood that there is nothing to worship there. Most likely they still remembered that not so long ago a shameless modern replica was fabricated there (on the initiative of, among others, the first Romanovs). But they constantly travelled to the ancient Chufut-Kale. The flow of the visitors of the highest rank, including the emperors and empresses, didn't wane until the beginning of the 20th century. After the 1917 revolution the legendary holy places of Crimea suffered a long period of oblivion. The memory of The Mother of God spending her last days here practically vanished. And only now, relying on the New Chronology we are reviving this remarkable historical information. Hence the role of significant sites in Chufut-Kale and its surroundings multiplies endlessly.

The famous 'ancient' story of Orestes and Iphigenia is another Act of Christ and The Mother of God. The old sources tell us about Iphigenia's (i.e. Virgin Mary's) stay in Tavrida = Crimea. Flight of Iphigenia, Orestes and Pylades is The Flight of the Holy Family into Egypt. In Crimea a special adoration of The Virgin Mary was spread. In fact it becomes clear why the Church of the Virgin Mary at Ayu-Dag Mountain was situated on the cape which was called PARTENIT. The simple reason was that Virgin Mary was called PARTHENOS, meaning Virgin. 'Ancient' names still point directly to the fact, that it was A Virgin, i.e. Virgin Mary, who the Crimean Tauroscythians worshiped.

Incidentally, the phrase 'Greek faith' earlier used to mean 'Christian faith', and the CHRISTIANS were once called GREEK (GREEK was used for CHRISTIANS).

At the end of the 18th century Romanov with the support of the Western European military forces was able to defeat both the troops of Tartaria Moscovite (the war with 'Pugachev') and the Crimean Khanate. After invading Crimea the Romanovs carried out a real pogrom, destroying the rich legacy of Russia-Horde. It is especially vivid in the example of the [[Assumption Monastery]]. The monks were evicted, a long 'quarantine' was laid on the monastery, the monastery's library was relocated somewhere and its fate is unknown.

The Khan palace in Bakhchisaray was destroyed. Little was left from its original look and décor. It seems likely that the Romanovs were finishing in Crimea the last remains of the Horde in the South. Besides, there were probably apprehensive of documents and books which were kept there, coming to light, which gave an account of the history of Russia and Crimea of the 15th century and the [[17th century]; historical accounts which were at great variance to the Romanov historians' enthusiastic versions.

The Romanovs' incredible campaign of wiping out any historical memory gives food for serious thought. In the centre of Russia they destroy documents and chronicles and efface frescos in the central cathedrals of Russia. In the remote regions of the Empire they simply banish from the homes those, who could still tell the truth about the former life and history of Russia-Horde. Needless to say there are no traces of the old frescos, inscriptions or paintings left in the Assumption Monastery. The destruction has been wholesale and thorough.

The town of Chufut-Kale was earlier called THE JEWELLED FORTRESS. Chufut-Kale enchanted many travellers. Evliya Chelebi wrote: "IN THOSE TIMES ALL THE PORTALS, WALLS AND GATES WERE DECORATED WITH PRECIOUS STONES".

Maybe he is referring to opulent mosaics. But it's quite possible, that something more luxuriant was meant here. As we now understand, that it was Chufut-Kale where Mary the Mother of God had died. Numerous pilgrims could have brought here generous offerings in the form of precious stones. They could have also decorated some of the buildings in Chufut-Kale, which would still cherish the memory of Mary. As it was a holy and sacred place the treasures could have been displayed not only inside the temples, but also on the outer walls. It is probable, that the pilgrims hung the decorations devoted to the Virgin Mary straight onto the railing of the mausoleum or the church dedicated to her. The Roman historian Iulius Capitolinus reports that in a settlement of Galal (i.e. Kale= Chufut-Kale) there was erected a temple dedicated to the Empress Faustina (aka Mary The Mother of God), who had died there. It's not difficult to imagine that not only the inside of the church, but also the walls surrounding it, could have been decorated with the luxurious gifts bestowed by the faithful. In that epoch no one would have touched them, the people regarded The Mother of God with such reverence.

But with time the tradition of bringing precious things here was forgotten. The memory of the first ceremonies and customs of the 13th century became a thing in the past. Bloody wars and pogroms tore through Crimea. Many things were eviscerated. The well-known Iosafatova valley near Chufut-Kale well corresponds the Biblical tradition. There are: a valley with an old name 'Iosafatova valley', a famous old cemetery steeped in adoration for many centuries. The historians themselves mention the 'Biblical appearance' of the necropolis. It is fascinating that burials in the Iosafatova valley began since 13th century. It is all correct. The relatives of Andronicus-Christ died in the beginning of 13th century. Virgin Mary came to Crimea and died at the end of 12th century beginning of the 13th century. Exactly at this moment a cemetery appeared and began to expand in the 'Iosafatova valley' near Chufut-Kale. So it is for a reason that in Life of Mary Mother of God it is said that Mary was buried near the Iosafatova valley. As we have shown, Mary Mother of God was indeed buried either on the territory of Chufut-Kale or in the cave church of the Assumption Monastery, i.e. in close proximity to the in the Iosafatova valley.

The Holy Grail is the golden cradle of Christ[edit | edit source]

The legend of the Holy Grail is widely known. In the Scaligerian history its essence is obscured. It is not known what the Grail actually is. Allegedly it is a cup into which Joseph of Arimathea collected Jesus' blood during His crucifiction. At the same time it is considered that the Holy Grail is related to the Last Supper and is linked with the communion cup in which wine symbolizes Christ's blood. The Western sources get confused about the location of the Holy Grail. They position it sometimes in France, in Britain and sometimes in the East. The Modern Christian Church doesn't officially speak out on the subject of what is the Holy Grail exactly. The legends of the Holy Grail appear both in the West and in the East starting with the 1100-1200. The aforementioned hazy interpretations of the Holy Grail most likely appeared quite late, not earlier than 1400-1500. The true story is forgotten and replaced with vague theories and philosophical speculations.

Presumably The Golden Cradle of Christ is in fact The Holy Grail. We have discovered that the later chroniclers would sometimes mix up Christ's Nativity with the crucifiction. In some legends, the Infant Jesus is killed with a small spear, by piercing His body. Evidently this is a mix up of the caesarean section with Jesus' execution. Christ was born as the result of a medical procedure: the Virgin Mary was given a small incision with a knife ('a small spear') in her body and the Baby was delivered. During the crucifiction Christ suffered the blow of a spear in His side. These two events have intertwined. In both cases blood was flowing. It could have (both factually and symbolically) coloured Christ's cradle and His body during the crucifiction (and at his birth). That is why they starting saying later that several drops of Christ's blood got into the Holy Grail. The same cup started to be called Joseph of Arimathea's sacred cup. So the commentators quite rightfully note that in some ancient texts the Infant Jesus and crucified Christ become victims. In other words the act of birth and the act of death become identified with each other. The cradle coloured with Christ's blood is on the whole the same thing as the Cup containing His blood. Christ was lying in the Cradle; His blood was in the Cup (Grail).

So, Christ's Cradle was situated in Crimea which has become a holy relic which received the following names 'the Golden Cradle' and 'The Golden Holy Grail'. For some time people knew where it was situated. Then the memory of it began to fade. But the tradition of connecting the Grail with Crimea lived on and had longevity. Consequently at some point the search for Grail was to start exactly here. And so it did. In XP, ch.5, we tell about numerous attempts to find the Holy Grail in Crimea, which were undertaken in the 20th century, as an example. Not only Russian archaeologists and enthusiasts were looking for it, but also many Western Europeans. This once again emphasizes a wide spreading of the information about the Golden Cradle.

It becomes clear why Mary Mother of God at the end of Her life came exactly to Southern Crimea. For some time She lived either in Chufut-Kale or somewhere near it. The choice of the place was not random and was a very natural one as on the Cape Fiolent not that far from Bakhchisaray and Chufut-Kale Mary gave birth to Andronicus-Christ. Therefore in the end She returned to the birthplace of Her famous son, and lived here until Her death. When a person specifically choses a place as their final resting place, such a choice is not usually a random one.

To conclude: Cape Fiolent is the birthplace of Christ, Mountain Beykoz is the place of his crucifiction, Chufut-Kale is the place of death and first burial of Mary Mother of God[edit | edit source]

To conclude, we were able to discover three geographical points, where the important events of the 12th century took place. In the 1800-1900 nobody anymore made a direct connection between the places identified by us and the story of Andronicus-Christ and Mary Mother of God (this connection was forgotten in the epoch of the 1600-1700)

  1. Andronicus-Christ was born in the Cape Fiolent in Crimea, circa 1152.
  2. He was crucified on Beykoz Mountain = Golgotha in 1185, on the Asian shore of the Bosphorus. Nearby are situated ruins of the original, i.e. Biblical Jerusalem, which was also called Yoros. On the shore of the strait, slightly to the south, is situated modern Istanbul.
  3. The Virgin Mary, Mother of Christ for some time lived and then died and was buried in Crimea in the cave town of Chufut-Kale. These events took place at the end of the 12th century.

In the 1100-1200 all three places enjoyed great respect. Here numerous pilgrims used to arrive. It was the time of Royal Christianity. Christ was worshiped and was called Zeus, Dionysus, Apollo, etc. Mary Mother of God was also referred to by different 'ancient' names. In Yoros = Jerusalem = Czar-Grad, in Beykoz-Golgotha and also in Crimea the 'ancient' temples and shrines dedicated to Andronicus-Christ were erected. Bloody sacrifices would take place there, among them, quite possibly, human ones. Such was the character of Royal Christianity of that time. After the victory of the Apostles' Christianity, Royal Christianity began to be called the primal Judaism and 'paganism'.

At the end of 3rd century AC after the Battle of Kulikovo, in the Great = 'Mongol' Empire the Apostles' Christianity was adopted as the state religion. The bloody sacrifices were banned. From the end of the 14th century Royal Christianity was declared as 'paganism' (primal Judaism), that is to say 'a false cult'. Hostility to it began, which also affected the attitude to the former relics. The places of worship themselves were preserved because they were Christian. But terminology, ritualism and many other things which create the 'external appearance', as well as the form of customs, changed. As before the faithful would arrive to visit the Holy places, however by then they would generally be the Apostles' Christians. The former 'pagan' past of the relics had begun to be forgotten and turned into a well-respected, but none the less 'someone else's past', 'antiquity'. The new priests would slightly change the old names, which would compound the confusion in people's minds. Eventually the Christians were made to think that Zeus, Apollo, Dionysus were some ancient deities and that the deep past of Beykoz, Chufut-Kale and Fiolent was by no means Christian, but in fact, 'pagan'.

A particularly severe distortion was created in the 1500-1700, when the false Scaligerian history was invented and implanted by force. It confused the picture even more. While combatting the memory of the Great Empire, they did their best to consign to oblivion the former 'Mongol' relics, including the older places of worship. To a large extent it was successful. However, 'success of the reformers' was far from complete. As not so long ago, in the 1600-1700 many could still remember the true history. Of course the younger upcoming generations were soon re-educated, however, a firm tradition had already been developed and established. That is why until now many come to Beykoz Mountain, Cape Fiolent and the City of Chufut-Kale to worship, though not longer fully aware of the true meaning of these holy places.

King Arthur[edit | edit source]

  • The Horde wars and the conquests of a latter epoch of the 1300-1500 were falsely inserted into the Life of Arthur-Christ. For example the story of the Battle of Kulikovo has been inserted. In it Arthur is identified with Khan Dmitryi Donskoy (Emperor Constantine) and also with the Biblical David. The well-known battle of Arthur with a fierce giant is David fighting Goliath. That is once again the Battle of Kulikovo.
  • The well-known wizard Merlin is a magus-sorcerer and also the Holy Spirit of the Gospels, and also (in some of the fragments of chronicles) the Emperor Andronicus-Christ himself.
  • King Uhter is King Herod, and in other fragments it is the Holy Spirit who procreated Christ (Arthur).
  • The story of Arthur's birth is the Gospel story of the Immaculate Conception and the Nativity of Christ.
  • In the Life of Arthur the story of John the Baptist is inserted.
  • The notorious traitor Modred or Mordred who rebelled against Arthur is the reflection of the Gospel King Herod and also to a greater degree - Judas Iscariot. The scheming Judas is also reflected in the image of King's Arthur 'unfaithful wife Guinevere'.
  • The cycle of legends of King Arthur was created quite late, in the epoch of the 1500-1600. The story of Christ is fantastically entwined here with much later events, mainly of the military history of the Horde. It's no coincidence that the name ARTHUR coincides with the word ARTA or HORDE.
  • The famous Round Table of King Arthur and the meeting of twelve of his best knights at the Round Table is a recollection of Christ's famous Last Supper, when at the same table not long before Christ's death all 12 of Jesus' apostles gathered together. A great deal is written about King Arthur and the Holy Grail. The literature dedicated to the Arthurian legends and their reflection in the fictional literature of different epochs and different people is truly vast. Now such a keen interest towards the persona of Arthur makes perfect sense.

Heracles[edit | edit source]

Heracles (Hercules) is a famous hero from 'deep antiquity'. Numerous 'ancient' authors have written about him. The theme of Heracles resonates continually and loudly at the beginning with the 15th century. 'Heraclean' statues, paintings, frescos and mosaics were being created, literary works, operas, symphonic poems and musicals were being written. A list of the prominent authors who created works in honor of Heracles occupies a considerable amount of space in the encyclopedia. Here is the result of our research of Heracles' life story. It appears to resemble King Arthur's 'biography'. The first and the last thirds of the life story are the phantom reflections of the story of Andronicus-Christ. The first third tells us about birth and adolescence. The last third is dedicated to the final stage of his life, including crucifiction. The middle of the 'biography' is of a completely different nature. In Arthur's case it concerns the epoch of the Ataman (Ottoman) conquest of the 1400-1500, the jousting contests (i.e. 'ancient' gladiators' tournaments). In the case of Heracles the picture is similar. The middle of his 'biography' is the 12 famous heroic deeds. They are identical to the tilting matches. Heracles battles against various characters and monsters, besides this there is some mention of 'fair ladies'. The 'ancient' Heracles behaves like a medieval knight.

We discovered that the 12 heroic deeds of Heracles correspond with the zodiacal constellations. Furthermore, it turned out that in some of the constellations the planets were specified. Therefore the description of Heracles' heroic deeds is an encrypted zodiac. We have dated it. It turned out that the astronomical solution exists (which at first glance was far from obvious). More than that, as a result there was a single digit date, i.e. year 1513.

Thus, the beginning and the end of Heracles' 'biography' is one of an early description of the life of Andronicus-Christ. The middle was made up of the events of the 1400-1500. The image of Andronicus-Christ was strongly reflected in both Royal, Ancestral and the Apostles' people's Christianity. In the Royal Christianity he was described in particular as the hero and demi god Heracles (and also as Zeus, Apollo-Apollonius, Dionysus, etc.). It was Royal Christianity which yielded an offshoot called Judaism with its sceptical attitude towards Christ.

Furthermore, it turned out the 'biography' of the famous 'antique' hero Theseus (Theos = God) consists of the events of both the 12th century and the 16th century. Incidentally, this is already familiar to us from the life story of Heracles, which consists of two layers the story of Andronicus-Christ of the 12th century and the events of the 1400-1500.

Christian cross and Crescent moon with a star[edit | edit source]

Two symbols meaning the same

In the epoch of the 1100-1500 the following two well-known symbols effectively signified the same thing. It is a crescent moon with a star and a Christian cross adjacent to a crescent moon. Today a crescent moon with a star is considered to be exclusively a symbol of Islam, of the Muslim faith, and a cross, at the base of which there is a crescent is regarded purely as a Christian symbol. However, Christianity of the 1100-1500 was one entity, and it was only at the end of the 5th century AC that a split began to appear, which led in the 6th century AC to the division of Christianity into several denominations Orthodox Christianity, Islam, Catholicism, Judaism, Buddhism, etc. A formerly united Christian symbol a crescent moon and a star=cross possibly first symbolised the Star of Bethlehem, which lit up at Christ's birth in year 1152, and also the solar eclipse, associated with the crucifiction of Christ in year 1185. You may recall that during the solar eclipse the sun initially turns into a half crescent. The crescent may also symbolise the Moon, which blocks the Sun. The star (cross) inscribed inside the crescent was depicted in various ways four-pointed, five-pointed, six-pointed and eight-pointed.

After the division of the churches in the 6th century AC the symbol of the star-cross has 'multiplied' and gradually turned into its modern versions, including that of a crescent and a star (today, as a rule, five-pointed) and also into a cross, adjacent to a crescent, etc. (look previous picture). A six-pointed star (= 6-pointed cross), which has 'separated' from the crescent began to be called the 'Star of David', which, by the way, is not surprising, as a significant part of the legends of Biblical David refer to Andronicus-Christ Christ was always associated with the Star of Bethlehem. So the 'Star of David', which today is considered exclusively to be a Judaic symbol, most likely symbolizes The Star of Bethlehem of the 12th century.

The fact, that on the domes of many Russian churches and cathedrals there is towering a Christian cross and a crescent, attracts our attention. Historians and members of clergy are often asked a question: what does it mean? As today a crescent is considered to be a symbol of Islam, distant from Christianity. So why then a crescent can be seen together with a cross? Usually the answer is as follows: purportedly, in the epoch of the religious wars Christianity in Europe defeated Islam. So they put an Ottoman crescent at the base of the Christian a cross as a symbol of victory, so that the people always remembered of the 'triumph of the cross over the crescent'.

Crescent in the center of the cross
Crescent at top of the cross

But such 'explanations' are invented post factum and do not represent the facts. The true meaning we have made clear above. In some places in Russia there have survived old depictions of a Christian cross and a crescent, where the crescent is not situated below, BUT IN THE VERY CENTRE OF THE CROSS, fig. 14 AND EVEN ON TOP OF THE CROSS, ABOVE IT.

So it is completely impossible to say, that here is depicted 'victory of the cross over the crescent'. If we follow the 'logic' of the historians, then we'll have the opposite: the crescent, placed ABOVE the cross should have been symbolizing the victory of Islam over Christianity. But how could a symbol like that appear in the Christian Orthodox cathedrals?!

The olympic games[edit | edit source]

It is possible, that the first 100-200 years after Christ's crucifiction up until the adoption of Christianity in the 14th century after the holy Battle of Kulikovo, the Olympic Games in memory of Christ were held in the Empire every four years. At first it was a commemorative celebration in the memory of Christ according to the laws of the 'Ancestral' Royal Christianity. Following the adoption of the Apostles' Christianity at the end of the 1300-1400 this custom was abolished and declared to be 'pagan'. On our suggestion the history of the Olympic Games was subject to a further deep analysis by Kurinnoy I.I. and the interesting results he arrived at are described in his book.

105 reflections of Jesus Christ = Andronicus-Christ = Andrey Bogoliubsky we have discovered in the Scaligerian history[edit | edit source]

Jesus Christ reflections

Picture shows the erroneous Scaligerian dating of the main multiple reflections (altogether there are already 113 of them) of Emperor Andronicus-Christ, aka the Great Prince Andrey Bogoliubsky, that we discovered. It resulted in an impressive list of 'phantoms'.

'Chronicle biographies' of Czar-Grad's Emperor Andronicus and the Great Russian Prince Andrey Bogoliubsky are the most complete surviving SECULAR testimonies about Jesus Christ, who lived according to the new chronology, in the 12th century.

a) ANDRONICUS COMNENUS, Czar-Grad, 'Byzantine' emperor, 1115-1185
b) ANDREY BOGOLIUBSKY, the Great Russian Prince of the 12th century

Some of the 'reflections' of Andronicus-Christ are partial. These biographies are comprised of several strands among which there is a prominent 'strand of Andronicus-Christ'. Sometimes it is the principle strand, sometimes not. In the latter case fragments of Christ's life are heavily intertwined with the information about other people from the epoch of the 1100-1400. So here is a complete list of the reflections of Andronicus-Christ we have discovered:

1) GREGORY VII HILDEBRAND, allegedly the 11th century, in Rome.

2) RUDOLF OF SWABIA, anti-king, allegedly the 11th century, in Rome.

3) EDWARD THE CONFESSOR, English king, allegedly the 11th century.

4) ROMANOS DIOGENES, allegedly years 1068-1071, in Byzantium.

5) ISAAK KOMNENOS (COMNENUS), allegedly years 1057-1059, in Byzantium

6) MICHAEL KALAFAT, allegedly years 1041-1042, in Byzantium,

7) ROMAN ARGIR, Byzantine Emperor, allegedly years 1028-1034

8) Death of a Russian prince OLEG, allegedly the 10th century

9) IGOR, a Russian prince, allegedly the 10th century

10) ASKOLD (Asa-Kolyada), a Russian prince, allegedly the 9th century

11) FOKA, Byzantine Emperor, allegedly years 602-610

12) VASILY THE GREAT a famous Saint, allegedly the 9th century

13) VASILY - a famous Christian evangelist, allegedly the 4th century

14) DOMITIAN (partial), an 'ancient' Roman emperor, ruling allegedly in years 81-96

15) HADRIAN, an 'ancient' Roman emperor, ruling allegedly in years 117-138.

Overall the biography of Hadrian is cast in a favourable light. However in the end of the story told by historian Aelius Spartianus a theme of 'cruel and bad' Hadrian unexpectedly emerges. What is it all about? Why is there such an abrupt change in attitude towards the wonderful Hadrian, moreover, within just one fragment, one which is clearly at odds with the overall the sympathetic tone of the description? Surely, the most contradictory qualities can reside in one person. However in this case an idea occurs, that we yet again come across a widely spread opinion in the 'antiquity' of the 1200-1500 that Andronicus-Christ was an 'evil person', 'mamzer', 'cruel monster'.

Byzantine Nikita Choniates, acknowledging the altogether outstanding role of Andronicus in History, talks a lot about his negative characteristics. He veraciously accuses him of a number of 'evil deeds'. We (can also see the same in the rabbinical Judaic version which presents Jesus as a negative character. Similar sceptical overtones also can be heard in works of the 'ancient' Titus Livius (Livy), when he described some of the duplicates of Andronicus-Christ. At the same time the other duplicates of Jesus are described in a positive way. Such contrasts are not surprising. The persona of Andronicus-Christ caused turbulent disputes and polarised opinion. The emperor died in 1185 as a result of the bloody revolt in Czar-Grad. It was followed by the revenge from Russia-Horde: the perpetrators of Andronicus-Christ's crucifiction were violently executed. All of this led to the sharply divided opinion.

16) AELIUS VERUS (the Elder, the father), 'ancient' Roman personage allegedly of the first half of the 2th century (under Hadrian)

17) AELIUS VERUS (the Younger, the son) 'ancient' Roman Caesar, who ruled in Rome allegedly in years 161-169 (Lucius Aelius Verus Caesar)

18) COMMODUS, 'ancient' Roman Emperor, ruled allegedly in years 180-193.

We cannot ignore a colourful plot which reveals the rebellious atmosphere simmering around the figure of Andronicus-Christ in the year 1185. We are specifically talking about the Senate Decree dedicated to Commodus-Christ. Each of its lines is infused with hatred. The text was written by people clearly not under control and openly spilling their emotions onto paper. Harsh negative comments about Jesus on the pages of the rabbinical Judaic texts pale in comparison with this scandalous Decree. The senate's decree probably came about amidst Czar-Grad scribes (Pharisees) and high priests who fiercely hated Jesus, according to the Gospels, and who made every effort to bring about His demise.

The true meaning of the senate's document becomes clear only now, after our research. This is the voice of Christ's enemies, surviving until today on the pages of 'ancient authors'. The latter editors forgot that it was Jesus who they were talking about here. If they knew, they would have destroyed the document.

No documents of such a strikingly critical nature have survived about any other Roman emperor. Of course, plenty negative things were written about Nero, Caligula and others. But in all those cases the emotions were much more restrained. There was no such fierce personal hatred towards a ruler. In Commodus' case the senators lost any control of themselves. Such fanaticism probably had a religious foundation. As Commodus is a reflection of Christ, the picture becomes clearer. The sympathisers and adversaries were split down religious lines.

Commodus-Christ was constantly called a GLADIATOR in the senate's decree (see next chapter). Repeated exhortations to 'pull' His body 'by a hook' were frequently made. They demanded to tear Commodus' corpse to pieces. Each sentence ends with an exclamation mark. Most likely, the document absorbed the cries of the mob, which, according to the Gospels, demanded Jesus' execution. In the Gospels this scene is described sparingly, but this 'ancient' text is much more detailed. In this way we can penetrate the events, briefly described in the Gospels, in more depth.

19) KOLYADA, god of the medieval Slavs, and also the Middle Ages West European SANTA CLAUS (SANTA CRUZ)

20) ODIN, a Germanic and Norse medieval god, but allegedly 'very-very' ancient .

21) JESUS CHRIST, allegedly the I century

22) APOLLONIUS OF TYANA, 'ancient' miracle maker, allegedly the 1st century

23) ANDREW THE FIRST CALLED, THE APOSTLE, allegedly the 1st century

The Scaligerian-Romanov dating of Baptism of Russia by Apostle Andrew allegedly in 900-1000 radically differs BY A THOUSAND YEARS from the same Scaligerian dating of the life time of Apostle Andrew as the I century. However the Baptism of Russia by Andrew himself ideally corresponds with the New Chronology and the shift to years 1053 or 1153. By retrieving the Gospel events from the phantom 1st century into the realistic 1100 century, we put everything in its place. It becomes clear, why it was exactly in the 1100-1200 when we see the 'explosion of Evangelism' and the blossoming of Christianity. It becomes clear that Russia 'didn't wait' for a whole THOUSAND YEARS to 'finally' adopt Christianity, but effectively adopted it immediately after the emergence of the new religion in the 12th century. In the 16th century Ivan IV the Terrible, not knowing yet of the Scaligerian chronology, which was introduced well AFTER HIM, 'pointed out that the RUSSIANS ADOPTED CHRISTIANITY NOT FROM THE GREEK, BUT FROM APOSTLE ANDREW HIMSELF. The same fact was pointed out to the Greeks a century later by the monk-priest Arseny Sukhanov who was sent to ... Greece'

24) GAIUS JULIUS CAESAR, the Roman Emperor, allegedly 1st century BC

25) MARK ANTONY, 'ancient' Roman military commander, allegedly the 1st century BC.

26) Death of the Egyptian Queen CLEOPATRA, allegedly the 1st century BC

27) SALMOXIS, a divinity of the 'ancient' Thracians, allegedly 'very-very ancient'

28) EUCLID, a famous mathematician, geometrician, allegedly years 315-255 BC. Thus, among the numerous reflections of Jesus Christ there is a fairly unexpected one. Christ is described in some of the 'ancient' sources as the 'ancient' Greek mathematician Euclid, to whom 'Elements', a famous book on geometry, is attributed. Presumably, the Emperor Andronicus-Christ was a patron of science, was interested in mathematics and by his order and maybe even under his supervision, the definitive work 'Elements' was created. By the way, the name Euclid is just a slight variation on the word KOLIADA one of Christ's names.

PunicWarsDiagram.jpg

29) HANNON, Carthaginian hero, allegedly the 4th century BC. Ancient Carthage is Yorus, aka Czar-Grad, aka the 'New City', aka Biblical Jerusalem, aka 'ancient' Troy. The famous Punic wars between Rome and Carthage are the internecine feuds between Russia-Horde and Czar-Grad, and also the reflection of the Ataman (Ottoman) conquest in the 1400-1500.

Scaligerian historians assure us that the Carthage of the chronicles is situated in Africa. However there are no archeological remains here of the powerful Carthage and the great Carthaginian Kingdom, worthy of exuberant chronicle descriptions. Several dilapidating brick columns were presented and declared without any proof to be the remains of 'that very' temple of Baal which stood in 'that very' Carthage of the chronicles. But such crumbling remains of the medieval foundations can be pointed out practically anywhere. In Africa, Europe, Asia, America... Identification of these bricks and stones with the 'annalistic Carthaginian' ones are entirely based on the erroneous Scaligerian geography and chronology.

It appears that not so long ago the archeologists took a textbook of the Scaligerian history and read in it that Carthage 'must be in Africa'. Having arrived to the North of Africa and having looked around, they saw nearby some dusty ruins. Rejoicing they said: There, we have found 'Carthage'. They found some inscriptions which were loosely interpreted as connected to Carthage. However such inscriptions do not at all prove that the METROPOLIS of Carthage was situated there. The city of Carthage, i.e. Czar-Grad, had many colonies scattered around the world. In each of them were kept the Czar-Grad documents, correspondence, etc. So the unearthing of Carthaginian coins in North Africa or say, in America, is not conclusive prove that 'the metropolis is found at last'.

Later, already in the 1800-1900, looking at a long and barren line of the North-African shore, in the very centre of which the historians have pointed out a small fertile valley and erroneously 'marked' here (on a map) the capital of the Carthaginian Kingdom, commentators were compelled to explain to themselves and to the public, how a generally fruitless land could feed such a large and powerful state, AS DESCRIBED IN THE CHRONICLES. But as no logical explanation was possible to find, they began to persistently repeat: 'Yes, it's infertile, but ... productive'.

Nevertheless, let's assume for a moment that historians are right and that in fact it was here in Africa, where the majestic capital of the mighty Carthaginian Kingdom was situated. But then it should be expected that in the 'most fertile valley' there survived some visible remains of the big city, etc... But no! There is nothing of the sort there. The Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedia melancholically informs us: 'NOTING HAS SURVIVED of the famous Carthaginian temples'. Of Carthage itself also nothing. Here they hastily concocted an explanation: Carthage was, purportedly, 'mercilessly destroyed so many times over'. That is why no traces have survived of it.

THUS, THERE ARE NO TRACES OF THE FORMER GRANDEUR OF CARTHAGE OF THE CHRONICLES LEFT IN NORTH AFRICA. In a more or less reliable history starting with the 17th century, we discover here only a small town. Just several hundred inhabitants. One mosque. No convenient harbours. Only 25-30 dwellings. Poor living conditions. Three scanty Arabic villages. One church. A museum, organised here by the Europeans in the 19th century in honour of the allegedly great 'ancient' past of these desolate places. Cardinal Lavigerie studied Scaligerian history well and decided to 'revive' the memory of Carthage here. He built a museum. But the cardinal made a mistake. He should have built it in a different place: in Czar-Grad. Admittedly there are enough museums in Istanbul without it.

Archeological works in place of the 'great African Carthage' began only in 1817. They were leisurely digging in the XX century as well. Nothing remarkable was discovered until now.

30) ISOCRATES, the Athenian orator and writer, allegedly years 436-338 BC

31) SOCRATES, Greek philosopher and thinker, allegedly years 469-399 BC. In the famous drama by Aristophanes 'The Clouds', which tells us about Socrates-Christ, a Gospel story is described: a story of a greedy traitor Judas Iscariot and the execution of Jesus. 'The Clouds' is considered as originating from a secular source. But Scaligerian history assures us that the life of Jesus is described exclusively in the religious original sources. As we can see it is not true.

It is possible that at the heart of 'The Clouds' was an old text, which was later lost. It was Christian and described the story of Judas Iscariot and the execution of Jesus. However, in the epoch of the Reformation, the dram was tendentiously rewritten. The derisive remarks addressed at Socrates-Christ and His mentees disciples are scattered about all of the text. They created an overall tone of mockery of Christianity. Later the Christian content of the play was forgotten altogether, and it began to be considered as just some 'tale from ancient life'.

Now when a true essence of many old texts becomes clearer, they begin to be much more interesting. For example, Aristophanes' "The Clouds" is usually considered to be a tedious epic poem. Indeed, primitive jokes and scoffs scattered about the text can hardly captivate a modern reader. But as soon as we discovered that all of this anti-Christian 'humour' was added on to it by more recent editors, and as soon as it becomes clear, that 'The Clouds' is an old text of the New Testament, telling us about Christ and Judas Iscariot, then the interest towards the play immediately increases. The same sort of thing happens to a number of other old sources. A new view perspective transforms them from half-forgotten and supposedly bleak texts into gripping accounts of the past.

32) LYSANDER, Spartan king, allegedly the V-IV cc. BC

33) NICIAS, Athenian commander, the ruler of Athens, allegedly the V century BC

35) PAUSANIAS, Spartan king, allegedly the V century BC

35) ANDROCLES, leader of the Athenian radical democrats, allegedly the V century BC

37) ANDOKIDES, Athenian orator and public figure, allegedly the V century BC

37) CYRUS THE YOUNGER, a Persian Prince, allegedly the V century BC, died allegedly in year 401 BC

38) TIMOCREON, Athenian, allegedly the V century BC

39) PHRYNICHUS, Athenian strategist, allegedly the V century BC

40) POLYCRATES, the tyrant of Samos, allegedly the VI century BC

41) ZOPYRUS, a Persian nobleman, organised the regaining of control over Babylon under the rule of king Darius, allegedly the 6th century BC

42) CYRUS THE ELDER, Persian king, allegedly years 559-530 BC

43) CROESUS, King of Lydia, allegedly years 560-546 or 590-545 BC

44) SERVIUS TULLIUS (MASTARNA in Etruscan) the penultimate king of the Royal Rome, allegedly years 578-535 BC. 'Ancient' historians spoke about his Etruscan origin. But in the epoch of the 17th century Reformation rebellion the information about the Etruscan, aka Russian, origin of Servius Tullius began to be considered 'exceptionally detrimental', 'very much incorrect'. Having grown to hate Russia-Horde, the former metropolis of the Empire, the reformers started declaring the Slavs, and especially the Russians, to be second rate people. That is why in some chronicles the words SLAV, SLAVONIAN surreptitiously were emended to SLAVE. Titus Livy probably acted in similar way, or it could have been his editors. It was decided that was better to declare Servius Tullius, aka Christ, to be a SLAVE, rather than continue to consider him to be ET-RUSCAN, Russian. Having confused the others, in the end, they got confused themselves. After which they began to authoritatively speculate sometimes patronisingly, and sometimes assertively and aggressively about the 'slave origin' of Christ. Like, he was a 'bad bastard'. His mother Mary was purportedly a slave too, moreover, a defiled one. Or else even worse - a lewd whore. Various theories have blossomed around this theme.

The 'Theory' about Servius Tullius' = Christ's supposedly slave background was being forced into the minds of people of the Reformation epoch with difficulty. Not so many were ready to accept it and forget the true history. It is known, that 'THE ROMAN SCIENTISTS ANNALISTS STRUGGLE WITH THIS TRADITION of biasedly labelling Servius Tullius and his mother as 'slaves' - Author) can also be seen in the narration of Livy, who, incidentally himself eulogised her'. This 'ancient' struggle unfolded most likely in the epoch of the 1500-1600 when the rebels-reformers began to enforce the Scaligerian version of history. The uprising opposition was overpowered, though with some effort. However, as we can see, many traces of the real history have survived.

45) PYTHAGORAS, a famous 'ancient' philosopher and mathematician, allegedly the 6th century BC

46) CYLON, Athenian, Olympic champion, allegedly the VII century BC

47) ROMULUS, the first king of 'ancient' Royal Rome, allegedly the VIII century BC

48) ISAIAH, messiah in the Old Testament, allegedly the VIII century BC

49) DAVID, Biblical king in the Old Testament, allegedly the 11th century BC

50) OSIRIS, an 'ancient' Egyptian god, and also an Egyptian deity HORUS, allegedly 'gargantuan antiquity'

51) SVYATOGOR, Russian Hero, allegedly 'very ancient'

52) DIONISUS, an 'ancient' god, allegedly 'gargantuan antiquity'. Also god ADONISUS

53) ORPHEUS, 'ancient' god, allegedly 'gargantuan antiquity'

54) ZEUS, supreme 'ancient' god, allegedly 'gargantuan antiquity'

55) PRIXUS (or FRIXOS), an 'ancient' hero, allegedly 'gargantuan antiquity'

56) JASON, an 'ancient' hero, who procured the Golden Fleece. Allegedly, 'gargantuan antiquity'. The voyage of the Argonauts to Colchis for the Golden Fleece is Andronicus-Christ's voyage to the goldfields in Russia. First twelve Argonauts are Christ's 12 Apostles. It is generally thought that the Argonauts invented the sail. The invention of sails in the 12th century corresponds quite well with the new chronology. In those times navigation was still coastal and didn't require complicated sails. The Empire of that time was colonising mainly only the coasts of the Mediterranean and Black Seas. Only later with the invention of the fully-fledged sails, the ships started venturing into the open sea and were capable of sailing upwind. Later, with the emergence of the horse cavalry, The Empire colonised vast spaces of Eurasia. But this took place as late as in the 1200-1300.

57) APOLLO, an 'ancient' god, allegedly 'gargantuan antiquity'

58) MARCYAS, a silenus, an 'ancient' character, allegedly 'gargantuan antiquity'

59) JOB, an Old Testament character, allegedly 'gargantuan antiquity'

60) ESAU (a partial duplicate), an Old Testament patriarch, allegedly 'gargantuan antiquity'

61) JACOB (a partial duplicate), an Old Testament patriarch, allegedly 'gargantuan antiquity'. Biblical Esau and Jacob are the intertwined reflections of Andronicus-Christ, John the Baptist and Judas Iscariot. The fifth lost Gospel is a story of Esau and Jacob in the Old Testament.

62) ORESTES, a famous 'ancient' hero, brother of Iphigenia.

63) RHADAMANTHYS, an 'ancient' god.

64) ASCLEPIUS (AESCULAPIUS) an 'ancient' god.

65) HERACLES (or HERCULES) (partial duplicate), an 'ancient' hero.

66) ARTHUR (partial), an well-known Medieval English king, allegedly the VI century.

67) MERLIN, a wizard, a close associate of King Arthur.

68) HELIOGABALUS (or ELAGABALUS), a Roman emperor of allegedly the III century BC. Andronicus-Christ, having arrived from Russia to Czar-Grad, introduced new customs, including those in clothing. For instance, it was thanks to him that the people of Czar-Grad started wearing trousers. Some opposed such innovations adamantly and accused the Emperor of adherence to the 'barbaric' customs. Similar events also occur under Heliogabalus.

Hence an intriguing story emerges. Heliogabalus-Andronicus has arrived, as it turns out, from Russia (Syria) to New Rome (Czar-Grad) in finery, in the description of which we can recognize the rich garments of the Russian-Hordian czars. Gold, purple, precious stones... Russia-Horde was a rich country. Contrary to that, proud Romains and Greeks dressed, as we were told, considerably more modest. The provinces of the Empire were clearly poorer. That is why the wealth of the newly arrived czar-khan and his entourage annoyed them. Moreover they did not like the introduction of the new Scythian clothing. For example, trousers.

An observation that garments made entirely of silk were also introduced by Heliogabalus becomes clear. Previously the Russian warriors specially dressed in silk, so that during their campaigns, when it is difficult to bathe, the bad bugs would not nest. Silk repel pests. Heliogabalus 'was the first to acquire silver self-cooking vessel'. Here we recognise the famous Russian samovars. Some of the noble-men of Czar-Grad were looking on with envy and discontent at the riches of the Hordian Czar who arrived from Russia. They could not accept that the Hordian czars wore not only expensive garments, but also luxurious footwear with precious stones, as well as opulent diadems. It is curious that Heliogabalus-Andrey would sometimes organise snowy hilltops in the garden during the summer, by delivering the snow. It was probably a commemoration of the snowy Russian winters, which never occurred in Czar-Grad.

69) THESEUS, an 'ancient' hero

70) BACCHUS, an 'ancient' deity

71) PROPHET MUHAMMAD (partial), a famous figure allegedly of the VII century AD

72) ALEXANDER OF MACEDON (Alexander the Great) (partial), a famous ruler allegedly of years 356-323 BC

73) ABU-MANSUR IBN-MUHHAMAD, an 'ancient' Iranian sheikh, allegedly the X century

4) KEYUMARS an 'ancient' Iranian king whose dates of birth and death are considered to be unknown. Suggesting that it is a very, very ancient character.

75) SIYAMAK, a son of king Keyumars, an 'ancient' Iranian prince, whose dates of birth and death are considered to be unknown. Suggesting that it is a very, very ancient character.

76) JEMSHID, an 'Ancient' Iranian king, allegedly 'very ancient'.

77) MERDAS, an 'ancient' Iranian king, allegedly 'from deep antiquity'.

78) ZOHAK (partial), an 'ancient' Iranian king. Dates of life are considered to be unknown.

78) FEREYDUN, an 'ancient' Iranian king. Dates of his life are considered to be unknown

80) ZAL-DESTAN (partial), an 'ancient' Iranian hero

81) ROSTAM or RUSTAM (partial). A famous 'ancient' Iranian hero

82) KAI-KHOSROW (partial), a famous 'ancient' Iranian king

83) ZOROASTER or ZARATHUSTRA, ZARANTUSTRA, ZARADUSHT, ZARDOST (partial), a famous Persian (Iranian) sage, prophet, saint; allegedly 'deepest antiquity'

84) EUSTRATE (OR EUSTRATES) PECHERSKY, holy martyr, crucified in Kiev allegedly in year 1096

85) HAMLET, prince of Denmark. He was described in 'The Life of Amleth' by Saxo Grammaticus allegedly of the 12th century and in tragedy by Shakespeare, 'Hamlet'

86) MACDUFF, a Scottish Thane, allegedly the 11th century. He is described in Holinshed's Chronicles and 'Macbeth', a tragedy by Shakespeare

87) APEMANTUS, a cynical philosopher, a contemporary of Alcibiades, allegedly the 5th century BC. He was described in Shakespeare's drama 'Timon of Athens'

88) APOLLONIUS OF TYRE (partial), a famous 'ancient' character, a hero of a rather famous 'novel' of allegedly the 3th century. He was described in Shakespeare's play 'Pericles'

89) TITUS ANDRONICUS, an 'ancient Roman character described in the texts of the 16th century, in particular in Shakespeare's tragedy 'Titus Andronicus'

90) POLYDORUS, described in Virgil's 'Aeneid'

91) ALCIBIADES (partial) a famous 'ancient' Athenian

92) MILTIADIS (partial), a famous 'ancient' character allegedly of the 5th century BC

93) GUINEVERE (partial) King Arthur's wife (Christ's) [\u0425\u0420], ch.7. Chroniclers sometimes mixed up a man and a woman.

94) THE PHOENIX a mythical creature that dies and is reborn.

95) 'A CERTAIN MAN', outwardly of human form, but godlike in deeds'. Thus Flavius Josephus begins his accounts of Christ, though in this part of his book he doesn't mention His name.

96) MITHRA (or MithraAttis), an 'ancient' Aryan god, and also an 'ancient' Persian god.

97) BUDDHA and KRISHNA, famous Eastern deities.

98) CAESAR OCTAVIAN AUGUSTUS (partial), a Roman Emperor allegedly of the I century BC the I century AD.

99) IGOR OLGOVITCH, a great Russian Prince of Kiev, martyr, allegedly the 12th century.

100) JOHN LAGOS (partial), described by a Byzantine author Nikita Choniates, the 12th century.

101) PATROCLUS (PARTASIS), an 'ancient' Greek hero, who fell in the Trojan War, and is described by Homer in his Iliad .

102) ARISTIDES of Proconnesus described by Plutarch.

103) CLEOMEDES of Astypalaea, described by Plutarch.

CaesareanSection.jpg

104) A number of other ancient heroes and characters delivered by caesarean section. Emperor Andronicus-Christ came into this world in this way. So: there's Typhon and Seth of 'ancient' Egyptian. Let's remember a Biblical story about the creation of Eve from Adam's rib. "And God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam (a man), and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man" (Genesis 2:2122). If we refer to the Medieval depictions of the given subject-matter, then on some of them we will see a picture rather resembling the birth by the caesarean section. See the details in our books of the 'Golden Series' B ('Zolotaya Seriya').

105) IGOR OLGOVICH, Prince of Novgorod and Seversk and the Grand Prince of Kiev (Holy Martyr Blessed Prince Igor Chernigovsky), executed in the 12th century, allegedly in year 1147.

Hence, the life story of Andronicus-Christ (Andrey Bogolyubsky) as reconstructed by us, is becoming enriched with many new interesting episodes. Previously the historians erroneously dated them as 'completely different personas' and ascribed them 'to the 'deep past'.

59 reflections of Virgin Mary[edit | edit source]

As we have shown in [\u0426\u0420\u0421], the Virgin Mary, Birthgiver of God, lived in the 12th century. She was born in Russia, probably in Rostov or nearby. For some time she lived in Czar-Grad, died and was originally buried in Crimea, in the cave town of Chufut-Cale. Throughout Christianity the attitude towards the Birthgiver of God is particularly respectful. However in the rabbinical-Judaic version, and also clearly apparent the writings by the 'ancient' authors (like Titus Livy), the Virgin Mary, as well as Christ, are on the contrary portrayed negatively. Mary was accused of fornication with a Roman soldier. They also allege she was raped. According to another version, a soldier secretly entered Mary's place at night in the guise of her husband. On that basis Jesus was called a 'pitiful mamzer', a bastard, i.e. born to Mary and Joseph out of wedlock. As we discover further, in a Roman version by Titus Livy, the Birthgiver of God is described as a famous 'Roman She-Wolf' ('The Capitoline Wolf'), and also as a promiscuous Larentia cheating on her husband with strangers. Similarly critical view of the Virgin Mary can be found in the works of other chroniclers. The picture is clear: many disputed the Christian idea of the Immaculate Conception and tried to belittle and to distort this motif, tirelessly conjecturing about the debauchery, a Roman soldier, rape, etc.

The following characters are the phantom reflections of Mary the Birthgiver of God in the Scaligerian 'History textbook':

1) VIRGIN MARY, allegedly the 1st century.

2) PALLAS ATHENA PARTHENOS A FAMOUS 'ancient' Greek goddess

3) MAIA (MAYA), MAIESTAS, MARIAMMA (MAARIAMMA), MARIANNE, MARITALA, MANDANE (OF MEDIA) mother of 'messiah' Cyrus, THE 'GREAT MOTHER' of Pessinunt, MARIAM, MARYIAM (MIRIAM), MERIDA, MYRRHA , MAIRA (MAERA), MUT-EM-WIA - 'most ancient' Indian, Asian and Egyptian goddesses-mothers.

4) Goddess LATONA or LETO, mother of the famous 'ancient' god Apollo

5) ISIDA (ISIS or IZIDA) 'ancient' Egyptian goddess, sister or wife of god Horus (duplicate of Christ)

6) DEMETER 'ancient' Greek goddess.

7) NEPHELE first wife of Athamas and mother of the 'ancient' hero Phrixus (=Christ)

8) CREUSA (or KREOUSA) wife of the 'ancient' hero Aeneas

9) DAUGHTER of Tarchetius, King of Albania, described by Plutarch

Plutarch" 10) ROMAN SHE-WOLF, who reared the royal brothers Romulus and Remus. Allegedly 'deep antiquity'. Various early authors talked about a Dog or a Lioness, but not about the She-Wolf.

11) LARENTIA, a wife of the 'shepherd' who brought up the Roman infants Romulus and Remus

12) THE 'SECOND' LARENTIA described by Plutarch

13) VESTAL VIRGIN described by the 'ancient' Roman historian Sextus Aurelius Victor in a legend of Romulus' and Remus' birth

14) RHEA (or REA) SILVIA, THE VESTAL VIRGIN, MOTHER OF ROMULUS AND REMUS, the famous 'ancient' Roman kings

15) In various texts VIRGIN MARY was confused with (partially) MARY MAGDALENE

16) MOTHER of the 'ancient' Roman king Servius Tullius. She was described, in particular, by Titus Livy

17) LUCRETIA, the famous 'ancient' Roman, raped by Sextas Tarquinius. Described, for example, by Titis Livy

18) PATRICIAN VIRGINIA, who erected a new holy altar. Described by Titus Livy

19) HELEN OF TROY - 'ancient Greek' abducted by Trojan Paris. The Trojan War started because of her. Described in particular by Homer

20) MAIDEN (QUEEN) KUNTI, mother of Yudhisthira (duplicate of Christ), described in the 'ancient' Indian epic Mahabharata. In the Indian sources Virgin Mary reflected also as the Goddess MAYA, who suckled Buddha (another duplicate of Christ)

21) DRAUPADI KRISHNAA, Indian princess, consort of Yudhisthira, Christ's duplicate. Described in the 'ancient' Indian epic Mahabharata

22) GODDESS PARVATI (partially), described in the old Indian sources

23) MYRTO, the second wife of the philosopher Socrates (duplicate of Christ)

24) PARYSATIS, mother of 'ancient' kings of Persia Artaxerxes (Herod's duplicate) and Cyrus (duplicate of Christ). Described by Plutarch and Xenophon

25) MANDANA OF MEDIA (Persian Queen, Persian Princess), mother of the 'ancient' king Cyrus (duplicate of Christ). Described in particular by Herodotus and in the Tale of Aphroditian

26) UMILA, the middle daughter of King Gostosmysl (duplicate of King Astyages, father of Mandana), corresponds to the daughter of King Astuages of Persia. A story about her is in the Russian Ioakim ( Russian version of the name Joachim) Chronicle, for example [\u0413\u0420], ch.3.

27) Cult of the GOLDEN WOMAN (ZOLOTAYA BABA) in Siberia

28) MYLITTA or MYLITA an 'ancient' Great Assyrian Goddess

29) Mother of 'ancient' hero Apollonius (of Tyana) (duplicate of Christ). Her name is not mentioned here

30) Philosopher DEMETRIUS- DEMETRA, a friend of Apollonius (of Tyana) described by Philostratus. A 'male-female' confusion

31) A noble woman CAESARISSA PORPHYROGENITUS MARIA, who has played a big role in Andronicus-Christ's life. She set him on a throne. Described, for example, by a famous Byzantine author Niketas Choniates

32) Parthenia (Pythais) , mother of 'ancient' Pythagoras (duplicate of Christ). Described by Yamvlikh, in particular

33) PLOTINA, 'ancient' Empress, enthroned Roman Emperor Hadrian, i.e. King Servius Tullius, i.e. Andronicus-Christ

34) SEMIAMIRA or (JULIA) SOAEMIAS mother of 'ancient' Emperor Heliogabalus (duplicate of Christ). Described by various Roman authors as the 'most virtueless woman'. So here Mary Theotokos (the Birthgiver of God) is represented in the critical rabbinic version

35) ANNIA FAUSTINA 'THE ELDER', wife of 'ancient' Roman Emperor Antoninus Pius.

36) FAUSTINA 'THE YOUNGER' (Faustina Minor), wife of 'ancient' Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius. She is mother of Emperor Commodus (duplicate of Christ). We have analysed biographies of the 'two Faustinas' Faustina The Elder and Faustina the Younger. It emerged that 'both' Empresses are the phantom reflections of the Virgin Mary from the 12th century. Consequently, using the information about Empress Faustina, we considerably widen our knowledge about Theotokos (The Holy Mother of God). For example, OF THE PLACE OF HER DEATH AND ORIGINAL BURIAL. For many years this subject has given rise to much discussion. But nevertheless the disputers rely on the same primary sources known before. Commentators just reinterpret time and time again the well-known testimonies of the ancient writers, while trying unsuccessfully to derive 'new knowledge' out of them.

Unlike this 'walking in circles', we rely on the New Chronology and on the NEW TESTIMONIES discovered with its help. Now it is possible to bring in some facts which were erroneously attributed to the different characters and to the different epochs. In particular, we could use the biography of the Empress Faustina. Before us no one considered these testimonies to be a reference to the Holy Mother of God. They were attributed to some little known ancient queen. That is why no one paid any particular attention to these documents. It turns out that they are exceptionally valuable. As a result we made an important discovery. There was enough new data in order to suggest and prove the hypothesis that Theotokos died and was originally buried in Crimea, in the cave town of Chufut-Kale.

37) 'LIVE ICON' of MOTHER OF GOD, which appeared near Crimean cave town Chufut-Kale.

38) MIRACLE-WORKING ICON OF MOTHER OF GOD which accompanied Russian Prince Andrei Bogolyubskiy (Christ) circa 1164-1169.

39) JANICKE-KHANYM (partial), a great khan queen, allegedly the daughter of Tokhtamysh-Khan of the Golden Horde. Her mausoleum is situated in the Crimean cave town of Chufut-Kale.

Christian cross inside crescent

40) Legendary Maria, in whose memory a famous fountain of tears was erected in the Bakhchisaray Palace. Until the present day a Christian cross inserted inside a crescent has survived on it, fig.19. In time, it was probably a decision to invent something in order to cast into obscurity the memory of the original Christian meaning of the monument dedicated to the Virgin Mary. That is why the legend was told with enthusiasm, that the Fountain was erected in memory of a CHRISTIAN girl - either some Georgian girl, or some Greek Dinorah Khionis, or maybe it was a Polish MARIA Potocka. Purporting that as the girl was a Christian, a Muslim Star inside a crescent was depicted in the form of a Christian Cross. So, there, you have an explanation of the Christian symbol on the 'Muslim' monument.

The publishers of the books about Bakhchisaray photograph the monument in such a way that the Christian Cross on its top is cut out of the shot. So there are fewer questions, to which they don't have the answers.

Thus, the famous Bakhchisaray Fountain of Tears and Bakhchisaray tomb of the 'Beautiful Princess' were erected most likely as memorial monuments to the Virgin Mary, Mother of Christ. She died in Chufut-Kale, near Bakhchisaray at the end of the 12th century beginning of the 13th century Chufut-Kale became a holy city and turned into the main residency of the Crimean khans. Then, after transferal of the khan's capital from Chufut-Kale to Bakhchisaray, the memory of Mary Mother of God was also transferred, having in particular built a magnificent marble Fountain of Tears (Mary's Fountain), which became a pilgrimage destination, as well as Dilara Bikech durbe (which in translation means: a tomb of a Beautiful Princess). It is most likely that this tomb is symbolic.

41) IPHIGENIA, ARTEMIS, DIANA (partial) 'ancient' goddesses of 'Ancient' Greece

42) SAINT THEODORA a prominent Crimean Medieval Queen. The capital of her principality was a famous Crimean cave city of Mangup

43) ELEKTRA (partial), sister of the famous 'ancient' Greek hero Orestes (Christ)

44) KLYTAEMNESTRA (partial), mother of 'ancient' Orestes (Christ)

45) IGRAINE Duchess, wife of Medieval Duke Gorlois of Tintagel and mother of famous 'English' king Arthur. She was described, for example, by Thomas Malory in his 'History of King Arthur' (Le Morte d'Arthur)

46) ALCMENA, wife of 'ancient' Amphitryon and mother of famous hero Heracles (duplicate of Christ)

47) AYE-MARY (MARIAN, MYRINE, MARIAMNA, MARIENNA, MARIANDINA) 'ancient' queen of Amazons

48) AETHRA, mother of Theseus (duplicate of Christ)

49) AMINAH, wife of Abd Allah, mother of Prophet Muhammad

50) MOTHER of Persian shah-king Fereydun (duplicate of Christ). She is not named here

51) SIMURGH BIRD (SIMORGH BIRD) (partial) (a legendary supernatural creature in the famous Iranian Epic the Shahnameh

52) RUDABA (or ROODABEH) 'ancient' Persian princess, who fell in love with Zal (duplicate of Holy Spirit)

53) FARANGIS 'ancient' Persian (Turanian) Princess, mother of King Kai Khosrow (duplicate of Christ)

54) NAHID 'ancient' Persian Queen, wife of ruler Darab. Nahid is mother of Iskender=Iskander (partial duplicate of Christ)

55) OLYMPIAS a famous 'ancient' queen, mother of Alexander the Great (Alexander III of Macedon). Alexander is a partial duplicate of Christ

56) GERTRUDE (partial) mother of 'Danish' prince Hamlet. She was described in particular by Saxo Grammaticus and William Shakespeare

57) DAUGHTER of king Antioch (partial). She was described, for example, in the play 'Pericles' by Shakespeare

58) LAVINIA, daughter of 'ancient' Roman hero Titus Andronicus. She was described, in particular, by Shakespeare in his tragedy 'Titus Andronicus'

59) MAGIC, MARVELLOUS (ENCHANTING) 'COW', who nourished Infant Fereydun (Christ) with her milk

39 reflections of John the Baptist[edit | edit source]

As we have shown in [\u0426\u0420\u0421], John The Baptist lived in the 12th century. The main contribution to his life story was made by the following real characters of the 12th century.

a) LEONTIUS, Bishop of Rostov, who lived in Russia.
b) Saint THEODOR of Suzdal (Rostov), who lived in Vladimir.
c) Byzantian JOHN (IOAN) KOMNENOS, who lived in Czar-Grad and was described by Nikita Khoniat in particular.
d) Byzantian ALE1000OS (or ALEXIUS) BRANAS or VRANAS, who lived in Czar-Grad and was described by Nicetas Choniates for example.

The following characters in the 'Scaligerian textbook' are the phantom reflections of John the Baptist.

1) JOHN THE BAPTIST, allegedly the I century. Some ancient authors confused Christ and John the Baptist

2) ST. VLADIMIR glorified among the saints as EQUAL APOSTLES, Vladimir The Red Sun (partial), Russian Prince allegedly of the 10th century

3) YAROPOLK (partial), Russian Prince allegedly of the 10th century.

4) JOHN CRESCENTIUS I Medieval Roman hero allegedly of the 10th century, predecessor of Pope Gregory VII Hildebrand of the 11th century, - one of the reflections of Andronicus-Christ

5) JOHN CRESCENTIUS II It appears, that there is another Crescentius (Crescentii) in the Scaligerian history of Rome. Allegedly he was the son of the 'John Crescentius I' (991-998). It is considered that the 'son' also ruled Rome from 1002 to 1012. Very little is known of him. Only that 'he continued his father's work'. Could it be, that this 'John Crescentius', the son of John Crescentius, is a second version of the same legend about John Crescentius 'The First'.

6) MARCUS TULLIUS CICERO (partial), famous 'ancient' hero, public figure, orator.

7) PUBLIUS CLODIUS PULCHER initially a close friend of 'ancient' Cicero, and later his staunch adversary. He was described, for example, by Plutarch

8) ISAIAH (partial), the Biblical prophet

9) THE ERYTHRAEN SIBYL, a legendary 'ancient' prophetess. Most likely, the famous old testament Sibylline Oracles were written by the Christians of the epoch of the 1100-1200 contemporaries of Christ and his followers. These remarkable works were created within the framework of the same literary school as the canonical Gospels and the Old Testament prophecies included in the modern Bible. It appears that among the originators of these creations was John the Baptist = Cicero = Sibyl, and also Christ's Apostles. It was they who wrote the first versions of the Gospels, Apocalypse and Biblical prophecies. Later these books were amended. All of the Christian texts of the 1100-1200 branched out and became more complex. As a result there survived a multitude of books whose subject is closely related. In the 1500-1600 the Scaligerian history artificially 'dispersed' them both chronologically and physically. Some of these texts were declared to be authentic, others to be apocryphal. After that began a deliberate desk bound 'scientific work' on interpretation and clarification of why the pre-Christian Sibylline Oracles speak so much and so loudly about Christ.

10) JASON (partially) - 'ancient' hero

11) AENEAS (partial) 'ancient' Trojan hero

12) AQUARIUS, including constellation of Aquarius on the old star maps

13) REMUS, brother of the 'ancient' king Romulus

14) CELI VIVENNA (IVAN, IOANN) 'ancient' Et-ruscan (Russian) hero

15) SERVIUS TULLIUS (partial) 'ancient' Roman king. In particular, execution ofthe Roman king SERVIUS TULLIUS is a (partial) reflection of the execution of John The Baptist. Some authors confused Christ and John the Baptist

16) CYRUS (partial) 'ancient' king

17) CLEON, son of Cleaenetus, 'ancient' character, 'ancient' Greek contemporary of Nicias (Christ) and Alcibiades (Judas)

18) APOLLONIUS OF TYANNA (partial), and also 'bad EUNUCH'. Described by Flavius Philostratus. To reiterate, some ancient authors confused Christ and John the Baptist

19) UNRULY BROTHER OF APOLLONIUS OF TYANNA- 'ancient' character

20) ABARIS, defended 'ancient' Pythagoras (Christ). Described by Yamvlikh

21) THE OLD TESTAMENT (GENESIS) ESAU. In particular, hairiness of Esau, and also animal skin into which Rebekah wraps Jacob - these are the animal skins which the Prophet John The Baptist wore.

22) SABINUS, 'ancient' character under the Roman Emperor Domitianus (Herod), mentioned by Flavius Philostratus in his Life of Apollonius of Tyana

23) ANTINOUS the most faithful companion of the 'ancient' Emperor Hadrian

24) ANTONINUS, twin-brother of the 'ancient' Roman Emperor Commodus (Christ)

25) AGAMEMNON (partial) the famous 'ancient' Greek king killed by his wife Clytemnestra

26) PYLADES a friend of 'ancient' Orestes (Christ)

27) KAY foster brother of the 'English' king Arthur, practically the same age. Described, in particular, by Thomas Malory

28) MAIDEN OF THE LAKE (partial), WALKING ON WATER, in the story of King Arthur

29) BALIN a poor, but noble knight in the story of King Arthur

30) ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY, categorically opposed Mordred marrying Guinevere. Described in the story of King Arthur

31) SAINT GERMANUS, who condemned King Vortegirn's marriage as incest

32) HERCULES IN LION SKIN (partial) [\u0413\u0420\u041a] ch.1. Also HERCULES (performing, during) his fifth labour (cleaning up of the Augean stables with water

33) IBN HAYABAN prophet who proclaimed to the Jews the impending arrival of the more powerful Prophet Mohammed

34) SERGIY a Christian Arian, who baptised Prophet Mohammed with water according to the Christian ordinance

35) VENERABLE ANTHONY OF KIEV NEAR CAVES (ANTHONY OF THE CAVES) spiritual guide to (Martyr) Eustratius Of Kiev Near Caves (duplicate of Christ). Allegedly the 11th century, Kiev

36) HAMLET SENIOR (KING HAMLET) murdered father of Prince Hamlet. Described by Saxo Grammaticus and William Shakespeare

37) HAMLET JUNIOR, i.e the actual Prince Hamlet (partial). Time and again we have noted that some authors have confused Christ and John The Baptist (incidentally, they were second cousins)

38) DUNCAN and BANQUO two rulers lords described, in particular, by Holinshed and Shakespeare in his tragedy 'Macbeth'

39) KING DUFF, described, in particular, by Holinshed and Shakespeare in his tragedy 'Macbeth'

61 reflections of Judas Iscariot[edit | edit source]

As we have shown in [\u0426\u0420\u0421], Judas Iscariot lived in the 12th century. The main contribution into his life story was made by the following characters of the 12th century :

a) ISAAC ANGELOS Byzantine ruler.
b) THE WIFE of Andrei Bogolyubskiy (Christ), a sister of the Kuchkovivhi (we have already seen that some ancient authors confused male and female).
c) YAKIM KUCHKOVICH, Andrei Bogolyubskiy's first wife's brother who was taking revenge on the Prince for his brother's execution; PETER, YAKIM'S SON-IN LAW and the steward ANBAL, YASSIN by birth (from the Caucasus).

The Phantom reflections of Judas Iscariot are the following characters from the 'Scaligerian textbook'.

1) PROCONSUL EGEAT (partial) or STRATOKLY, brother of EGEAT, described in the Life of Apostle St. Andrew The First-called (Protocletos) (duplicate of Christ)

2) CHENCIO (also Cencius or Centius) - a Roman nobleman, who allegedly plotted (organised a plot) against Pope Gregory Hildebrand VII (duplicate of Christ)

3) TYPHON and SETH 'ancient' Egyptian characters, enemies of god Osiris (duplicate of Christ)

4) MICHAEL IV THE PAPHLAGONIAN (partial) Byzantine Emperor, succeeding Romanos III Argyros (duplicate of Christ) allegedly in the 11th century

5) OLEG, Russian Prince (partial), who killed Askold (duplicate of Christ) and Dir

6) SNAKE or SERPENT, who slyly bit Prince Oleg (duplicate of Christ). On the pages of the ancient chronicles Judas Iscariot was sometimes described as a cunning snake who's bitten Jesus. In the Gospels it is Judas's notorious kiss

7) ASP, which bit 'ancient' Egyptian Queen Cleopatra. In the apocryphal Gospels it is said that Judas has bitten Jesus on his 'right side'

8) TIMON THE MISANTHROPE described by 'ancient' Plutarch. It is the very same Timon ('The Dark') described by Shakespeare in his 'Timon of Athens'

9) INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF ISCOROSTEN, THE DREVLYANE (or the Derevlians, Drevlianians), who attacked the Russian Prince Igor (duplicate of Christ)

10) SULLEN TELAMON, 'who saw everything in gloomy light'. It is one of the twelve 'ancient' Argonauts (apostles of Christ, i.e. of Jason)

11) THE SLY KING OF THRACE (or KING OF THRACIANS), who betrayed Polydorus (duplicate of Christ) because of his greed. Described in 'The Aeneid' by Virgil

12) PHILOLOGUS, a traitor, who received a noble upbringing and education from Cicero, a freed slave of his brother Quintus

13) ENEMIES of philosopher Socrates (duplicate of Christ), who received 30 silver minae (30 pieces of silver) for him

14) XANTIPPE, argumentative and bad-tempered wife of Socrates

15) STREPSIADES, greedy and cunning enemy of Socrates (Christ), described in particular by Aristophanes

16) TISSAPHERNES, former friend of Cyrus the Younger (duplicate of Christ), who slandered him. Described for example by Xenophon

17) CLEARCHUS, son of Rhamphias a Spartan general, mentioned by the Greek historians: Thucydides, Xenophon, Diodorusand others. Betrayed prince Cyrus The Younger (duplicate of Christ)

18) A certain 'MONEY BUSINESS' in Czar-Grad, which was the reason for some Scynthian deaths. The Russian princes Ascold and Dir attacked Czar-Grad in order to avenge

19) MARD GIREAD and a 'careless defender' of the city of Sardis described by Herodotus. It was on their account that the inhabitants of Sardis were defeated and King Croesus (duplicate of Christ) was captured

20) THE ALCMAEONIDS - blasphemous perpetrators (those responsible for) of Cylon's death (duplicate of Christ). Described by Thucydides and Herodotus

21) ALCMAEON the founder of the Athenian family of the Alcmaeonids. It was in 1600 - 1700 that the story of 'ancient' Alcmaeon-Judas became especially popular. It means that for the people of that epoch 'antiquity' was not at all so ancient. On the contrary it was rather of current interest. It was vigorously disputed. The fact is 'antiquity' is the epoch of the 1300-1500 immediately before the 1600-1700. Scaligerian editing of ancient sources falls exactly on the epoch of 1600-1700. The reformers without any reservations were altering the evaluation of the events of the recent past, unashamedly recolouring black into white and vice versa. It's no coincidence that it was at that time an noticeable increasing interest towards Alcmaeon-Judas started in Western European society. From a sinister character and greedy traitor there was 'created' - on paper - an attractive image of a tragic, somewhat messed up, but on the whole a 'very good hero'. It is true, he stabbed to death his own mother, deceived his wife, fell into incestuous relationship with his daughter. But on the whole, they say he was a wonderful person, deserving the deepest sympathy. He is exemplary. Thirty operas were composed about him. For soloists, chorus, ballet and orchestra. The opera-houses were packed with enthusiastic listeners-reformers.

In the East, in particular in the Russian Orthodox Church, the persona of Judas Iscariot was always evaluated extremely negatively. Beautiful operas were not composed in his honour. He was not exhibited as an exemplary figure. There were no eulogies, his praises were not sung.

22) MESSENGER-INFORMER, who betrayed the Spartan King PAUSANIAS (duplicate of Christ). Described for example by Thucydides.

23) THEMISTOCLES renowned 'ancient' Athenian. Described by Thucydides, Plutarch and other authors.

24) ALCIBIADES (partial) renowned 'ancient' Athenian of the Alcmaeonidae family (the Achaemenids) (see above). Some authors confused Christ with Judas Iscariot

25) TIMAEUS, a cunning friend of Andokid (duplicate of Christ), described by Plutarch

26) HERMOCRATES - Syracusian, who betrayed commander Nicias (duplicate of Christ), described, for example, by Thucydides

27) GYLIPPUS (partial) a Spartan commander, participated in Nicias' war, stole 30 talents of money

28) OROETES 'ancient' Greek satrap, enemy of king Polycrates (duplicate) of Christ. Described by Herodotus

29) MAEANDRIUS King Polycrates of Samos' secretary. Described by Herodot

30) ACTOR a cowardly accomplice of Spartan King Lysandros' plot (duplicate of Christ)

31) SNAKE, dangerous for the Spartan King Lysander

32) PROVOCATOR, who accused Apollonius of Tyana (duplicate of Christ) and his companions of offending Roman Emperor, by mocking his godlike voice

33) PROSECUTOR, who 'made up' a denunciation of Apollonius. He personally spewed charges at Apollonius (Christ), in an attempt to ruin him

34) EUPHRATES - supposedly a friend in the beginning, but in reality a secret envier and opponent of Apollonius of Tyana (duplicate of Christ)

35) MARSYAS (partial) 'ancient' Silenus. He loses a 'contest' with the god Apollo (duplicate of Christ). Partially Marsyas is also a reflection of Christ Himself

36) CYLON, a wealthy nobleman, who attempted to become student of Pythagoras (duplicate of Christ)

37) JACOB (partial) a character from The Old Testament, who bought his birthright from Esau (here Esau is Christ). But in the other episodes of the Old Testament, on the contrary, Jacob is Christ, and Esau is Judas Iscariot

38) Valkerie - false prophet, contemporary of the Biblical prophet Isaiah (i.e. Jesus)

39) STEPHANUS a traitor, who offered his advice and help to the conspirators, in order to assassinate Roman Emperor Domitian (partial duplicate of Christ)

40) CLODIANUS a conspirator, who participated in the assassination of Emperor Domitian (here Christ)

41) AVIDIUS CASSIUS 'ancient' Roman general of the epoch of the Emperors Aelius Verus father and Aelius Verus son (both are the reflections of Christ), and also of Aelius Hadrianus (Christ)and Commodus Antoninus (Christ)

42) PREFECT in Rome under Emperor Hadrian, who deceived the Emperor. Received payment of three hundred million

43) AEGISTHUS (partial) - enemy of Orestes (Christ), lover of Queen Clytemnestra, Agamemnon's wife

44) SNAKE, who bit Orestes (Christ) and destroyed him

45) ERIGONE Erinyes, the main accuser of Orestes (Christ), committed suicide (she hanged herself)

46) MODRED or MORDRED - a notorious traitor, who rebelled against King Arthur (here - Christ)

47) GUINEVERE (partial) the 'unfaithful' wife of King Arthur. Chroniclers sometimes confused Christ and Judas

48) SNAKES, who attacked a young Hercules-Christ

49) DEIANIRA wife of the 'ancient' hero Hercules (Christ). It is a duplicate of the cunning wife of Andrei Bogolyubskiy

50) DIOSKURI 'ancient'-Greek characters

51) MENESTHEUS, protégé of the DIOSCURI, 'ancient' Greek character

52) LYCOMEDES 'ancient' Greek king, who killed Theseus (Christ) treacherously on the island of Scyros

53) AHRIMAN demon, embodiment of evil in the 'ancient' Iranian mythology. Ahriman or its malicious son DIV or BLACK DIV opposes Siyamak (Christ)

54) ZOHAK (partial) malicious, dragonlike character, enemy of the good king Jemshid (Christ). Described in the Iranian epic Shah Nameh. At the same time the 'good part of Zohak' is the reflection of Christ. Sometimes Judas was confused with Christ

55) KORSUN JEW, who sold the martyr Eustrate Pechersky (duplicate of Christ). Allegedly the 11th century, Kiev

56) ROSENCRANTZ AND GUILDENSTERN two characters from Shakespeare's tragedy 'Hamlet'

57) LAERTES, son of Polonius and brother of Ophelia - characters from Shakespeare's tragedy 'Hamlet'

58) SATURNINUS (partial), an 'Ancient' Roman ruler, duplicate of Isaak Angelos, a relative of Titus Andronicus, whom he dethroned. Described by Shakespeare in his tragedy 'Titus Andronicus'

59) MOOR AARON scheming and greedy lover of Queen Tamora, enemy of Titus Andronicus. Described by Shakespeare in his tragedy 'Titus Andronicus'

60) TAMORA - Queen of the Goths, enemy of Titus Andronicus. Duplicate of the malicious wife of Prince Andrei Bogolyubskiy, she conspired in the plot against him. Described in Shakespeare's tragedy 'Titus Andronicus'

61) DOMITIA LONGINA malicious wife of Emperor Dimitian (partial duplicate of Christ)

Now we are presented with a wonderful opportunity to learn many new things about the life of Andronicus-Christ, Apostle Judas Iscariot and on the whole about the events of the distant 12th century. The books by Herodotus, Thucydides, Xenophon and other 'classics' inform us about the events dimly reflected or not at all described in the canonical Gospels and in the New Testament Literature. Based on the 'ancient' authors we are writing much more detailed life descriptions of the famous Gospel characters.

Astronomical dating of the new chronology[edit | edit source]

We will list the exact astronomical dates from the ancient zodias which point themselves into the 12th century and are included in the 'framework' of the new chronology along with some other data.

Tomb of Ramses VI

1. (Years 1146 or 1325) ZODIAC RC FROM THE TOMB OF PHARAOH RAMESSES IV. An image on the ceiling of the burial chamber. 'Ancient' Egypt, Luxor, Valley of the Kings, allegedly 'antiquity'. In fact

  1. variant: 15-16 April 1146
  2. variant: 10-17 April 1325 [\Uffffffff\u0425\u0415].
Tomb of Senenmut

2. (Year 1148) SECOND ZODIAC SX FROM THE TOMB OF SENENMUT. It is depicted on the arches of the tomb. 'Ancient' Egypt, Luxor, allegedly 'antiquity'. In fact: 17-18 June 1148

Tomb of Ramses IX

3. (Year 1148) ZODIAC RD OF RAMSES IX. Frescos on plaster on the arches of the burial chamber. 'Ancient' Egypt, Luxor, Valley of the Kings, allegedly 'Antiquity'. In fact: 17 June 1148

4. (Year 1151) ZODIAC AE of NATIVITY, allegedly the I century. Depicted in the old book of Ebenezer Sybli. In reality his dating is as follows: 25th December 1151. So in fact the zodiac is dedicated to the birth of Andronicus-Christ (Andrei Bogolyubskiy) [\u0415\u0420\u0418\u0417].

Golden horn of Copenhagen

5. (Year 1166) ZODIAC RG ON THE GOLDEN HORN (OF GALLEHUS) FROM COPENHAGEN. The engraving on the horn made of gold. Denmark, allegedly the V century. In fact: 17-28 May 1166

Birth of sun, Dentera

6. (Year 1168) LONG DENDERA ZODIAC DL. Depicted on the stone slabs on the ceiling of a temple, bas-relief. 'Ancient' Egypt, Dendera, allegedly 'antiquity'. In fact: 22-26 April 1168

Tomb of Ramses IV

7. (Year 1182) ZODIAC OF RAMSES VII = THEBES COLOUR ZODIAC OU. Colour fresco on the tomb ceiling. 'Ancient' Egypt, Luxor, Valley of the Kings, allegedly 'antiquity'. In fact: 5-8 September 1182

Zodiac of Dendera

8. (Year 1185) THE CIRCULAR ZODIAC OF DENDERA DR. Depicted on a large stone slab, bas-relief. 'Ancient' Egypt, Dendera, allegedly 'antiquity'. In fact: morning of the 20th March 1185. It appears that this well-known Zodiac was dedicated to the crucifiction of Andronicus-Christ in 1185.

We are being assured that it was the French who dismantled The Circular Zodiac of Dendera in the epoch of Napoleon and moved it to Paris. For example in the book 'Ancient Egypt. History and archaeology' (Whitestar Publishers, Italy, 2001) it says: "In 1820 Sébastien-Louis Saulnier, a member of French parliament, commissioned Jean Baptiste Leloraine, a master mason, to remove the zodiac, which he succeeded to complete in four weeks. Zodiac arrived to Paris in January 1822 and was acquired by the king for his library". However other sources inform us rather differently. "Senkovskii O.I., a famous Russian Orientalist, Arabist, an educated man of his time... together with his servant without any qualms cut out a part depicting the zodiac from the ceiling of the Denedera Temple. In 1821 the most intriguing ancient Egyptian monument was put aboard a bark, sailing to Russia, however the breakdown of diplomatic relations with Porte forced Senkovskii to suspend the registration of the unusual baggage. Later the zodiac removed by him emerged in Paris.

It turns out that the French somehow intercepted the most valuable stone slab with a Circular Zodiac from the Russians. As we see, the role of the Russian explorers of Egypt, including the outstanding Egyptologist Golenishev V.C., was later on deliberately played down. The Germans and the French were declared the 'principal Egyptologists'. It is worth mentioning that on the frontispiece of the FIRST edition of the Napoleon album 'Description of Egypt' which appeared in 1809-1828 in France, the stone slab with a Circular Zodiac, as a separate unit separated from the ceiling of the temple, was not yet depicted. It was added only IN THE SECOND French edition of the work. In other words - post factum.

Mithra of Geddernheim

9. (Years 1186 or 1007) ZODIAC OF MITHRA OF GEDDERNHEIM. Stone bas-relief. Europe, Germany, allegedly 'antiquity'. In fact

  1. variant: 14-15 October 1007
  2. variant: 14-15 October 1186
Zodiac of Erment

10. (Years 1189 or 1071 or 1308) CONCISE ZODIAC KZ. Stone bas-relief on the ceiling of the temple in the city of Erment. 'Ancient' Egypt, allegedly 'antiquity'. In fact

  1. variant: 15-16 May 1071
  2. variant: 30-31 May 1189
  3. variant: 6-8 May 1308

11. (Circa 1150) The famous supernova explosion which today is dated to year 1150, in fact it took place a century later, circa 1150. It was this star that was reflected in the Gospels as the Star of Bethlehem

12. (Year 1185) According to the church tradition it is the solar eclipse that is connected with the crucifiction of Jesus. Whereas the evangelists didn't call the duration of the 'fall of darkness' at a point on the earth surface acting as the THREE hours of darkness, but THE FULL TRAVEL TIME OF THE MOON's UMBRAL SHADOW ALONG THE EARTH SURFACE. In other words the duration of eclipse from the beginning to the end. The evangelists had a good reason to use here the expression 'all over the world'. The full solar eclipse of the 1st May 1185 occurred the same year that Christ was crucified. A crescent with a star became an ancient symbol of Czar-Grad. It appears that it symbolized the Moon eclipsing the Sun in the year of the crucifiction of Andronicus-Christ, and the Star of Bethlehem, blazing up circa 1150 (and later on erroneously moved to year 1054). The crescent could have depicted both the Moon and the disc of the Sun at the moment of a near full eclipse forming a sickle shape.